Search results
The Anti-Federalists did not want states to ratify the Constitution because it would. ... According to Article II of the Constitution, one of the president's duties ...
One way to define the Antifederalists is that they are those who opposed ratification of the unamended Constitution in 1787-1788. This definition might well make them lower case antifederalists or anti-federalists. The point is that they are both incoherent and irrelevant.
People also ask
Why did the Anti-federalists not want States to ratify the Constitution?
Why did the Anti-federalists oppose the Constitution?
Did Federalists ratify the Constitution?
Did the Antifederalists want Union?
Apr 23, 2024 · One of the most succinct enumeration of the arguments of the Anti-Federalists against the Constitution is found in a letter commonly known as Anti-Federalist number 44. The author anonymously signed the letter “Deliberator.” The author listed several points raised by a Federalist in another letter published anonymously in the Pennsylvania ...
The main thing that convinced many (but by no means all) of the Antifederalists to support the new Constitution was the addition of the Bill of Rights. This alleviated the fears of many of the ...
- Unit Objective
- Lesson 1
- Lesson 2
- Lesson 3
This unit is part of Gilder Lehrman’s series of Common Core State Standards–based teaching resources. These units were developed to enable students to understand, summarize, and analyze original texts of historical significance. Through a step-by-step process, students will acquire the skills to analyze any primary or secondary source material.
Objective
Today students will participate as members of a critical thinking group and "read like a detective" in order to analyze the arguments made by the Federalists in favor of ratifying the new US Constitution.
Introduction
Tell the students that after the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, the nation’s new Constitution had to be ratified by the states. The debate over ratification became very heated, especially in New York. This led to a spirited exchange of short essays between the Federalists, who promoted the new Constitution, and the Anti-Federalists, who put forward a variety of objections to the proposed new government. Today we will be closely reading excerpts from four of the Federalist...
Materials
1. Federalist Papers #1, #10, #51, and #84 (excerpts). Source: The full text of all the Federalist Papersare available online at the Library of Congress. 2. US Constitution, 1787. Source: Charters of Freedom, National Archives and Records Administration, www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters 3. Overhead projector or other display
Objective
Today students will participate as members of a critical thinking group and "read like a detective" in order to analyze the arguments made by the Anti-Federalists in opposition to ratifying the new US Constitution.
Introduction
Review the background information from the last lesson. Today we will be closely reading excerpts from four of the Anti-Federalist Papers in order to discover just what the Anti-Federalists’ positions and arguments were. Although the Anti-Federalists’ essays were written anonymously under various pen names, most famously "Brutus," historians generally agree that among the authors of the Anti-Federalist essays were Robert Yates, Samuel Bryan, George Clinton, and Richard Henry Lee.
Materials
1. Anti-Federalist Papers #1, #9, #46, and #84 (excerpts). Source: Morton Borden, ed. The Antifederalist Papers(East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1965). Unlike the Federalist Papers, the essays by Anti-Federalists were not conceived of as a unified series. Thus historians have imposed different numbering systems as they compiled various essays; the numbers used here are Morton Borden’s chronology. 2. US Constitution, 1787 3. Overhead projector or other display method
Objective
The students will deeply understand the major arguments concerning the ratification of the US Constitution. This understanding will be built upon close analysis of the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers. The students will demonstrate their understanding in both writing and speaking.
Introduction
Tell the students that now they get to apply their knowledge and understanding of the Federalist and Anti-Federalist arguments. They will need to select a debate moderator from within their group and divide the remaining students into Federalists and Anti-Federalists. As a group they will write questions based on the issues presented in the primary documents. They will also script responses from both sides based solely on what is written in the documents. This is not an actual debate but rath...
Materials
1. Federalist Papers #1, #10, #51, and #84 (excerpts) 2. Anti-Federalist Papers #1, #9, #46, and #84 (excerpts) 3. US Constitution, 1787
Article V. The section of the Constitution that details how to amend the Constitution, either through a congressional proposal or a convention of the states, with final ratification from three-fourths of the states. Great Compromise. Also known as the Connecticut Compromise, a major compromise at the Constitutional Convention that created a two ...
Apr 28, 2022 · Best Answer. The Anti-Federalists wanted the Bill of Rights added to the Constitution. They believed that the federal government had too much power under the new Constitution, especially in ...
