Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. May 11, 2018 · The anti-Federalists voiced objections to the proposed Constitution in 17871788. This diverse group was concerned about the amount of power the Constitution would grant the national government, apprehensive about representation at the national level, and disturbed over the lack of safeguards for citizens' rights.

  2. Mar 4, 2020 · The Anti- Federalists had a strong distrust of government power. A national government with too much power was, as far as they were concerned, a pathway to government oppression. Just over two hundred and thirty years ago, a convention gathered in Philadelphia to consider improvements to the United States’ first constitution, The Articles of ...

  3. The main arguments under scrutiny were how much control and power should be vested in the singular national government. Antifederalists, as they came to be called, were the voices warning of tyranny and a new monarchy if too much power was vested in a national body.

  4. Aug 8, 2019 · The claim of the anti-federalists in effect was that the amount of power vested in the national government, the enumerated powers of article one section eight reinforced by the necessary and proper clause would ab initio, from the very beginning, create this kind of head long drift of power towards the national government.

  5. Anti-Federalists argued that the proposed Constitution would take from the states their principal means of defense against federal usurpation. The Federalists responded that fears of federal oppression were overblown, in part because the American people were armed and would be almost impossible to subdue through military force.

  6. Opponents of ratification were called Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists feared the power of the national government and believed state legislatures, with which they had more contact, could better protect their freedoms.

  1. People also search for