Search results
May 11, 2018 · Anti-Federalists considered extensive national power problematic for a number of reasons. They complained that the national government could tax them without constraint, that it could build an expensive and dangerous army, and that it could even take away the rights that Americans expected government to protect.
The main arguments under scrutiny were how much control and power should be vested in the singular national government. Antifederalists, as they came to be called, were the voices warning of tyranny and a new monarchy if too much power was vested in a national body.
Mar 4, 2020 · Mar 4th, 2020. The Anti- Federalists had a strong distrust of government power. A national government with too much power was, as far as they were concerned, a pathway to government oppression. Just over two hundred and thirty years ago, a convention gathered in Philadelphia to consider improvements to the United States’ first constitution ...
Oct 10, 1787: Randolph Letter, On the Federal Constitution (Virginia) Oct 11, 1787: Cato II (New York) Oct 12, 1787: Federal Farmer IV (Virginia) Oct 12, 1787: An Old Whig I (Pennsylvania) Oct 13, 1787: Federal Farmer V (Virginia) Oct 16, 1787: Richard Henry Lee to Edmund Randolph (New York)
Antifederalists generally believed that governmental power was best concentrated in the legislature as the most democratically responsive branch. They were also more likely than not to maintain that such local, legislatively oriented government offered the best protection for fundamental rights.
Sep 27, 2017 · The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country. Anti-Federalists in Massachusetts, Virginia and New York, three crucial states, made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights.
The Anti-federalists were a group who had reservations about ratifying the U.S. Constitution when it was first proposed. Some thought the Articles of Confederation were sufficient to unite the sovereign American states; others were concerned that the rights of the states and of individuals needed additional protection and so supported a Bill of ...