Search results
May 11, 2018 · Anti-Federalists considered extensive national power problematic for a number of reasons. They complained that the national government could tax them without constraint, that it could build an expensive and dangerous army, and that it could even take away the rights that Americans expected government to protect.
The main arguments under scrutiny were how much control and power should be vested in the singular national government. Antifederalists, as they came to be called, were the voices warning of tyranny and a new monarchy if too much power was vested in a national body.
Learning Objectives. Understand and be able to apply what Anti-federalists meant by the terms “extended republic” or “consolidated republic.” Analyze and rank the problems the Anti-federalists believed would arise from extending the republic over a vast territory.
Apr 24, 2017 · According to Kenyon, the Antifederalists—she does not hyphenate them—were irrelevant because they did not accept the system of representation incorporated in the Constitution. But, according to Kenyon, they had a coherent theory of federal republicanism.
The Anti-Federalists, in Herbert J. Storing’s view, are somewhat paradoxically entitled to be counted among the Founding Fathers and to share in the honor and study devoted to the founding. “If the foundations of the American polity was laid by the Federalists,” he writes, “the Anti-Federalist reservations echo through American history ...
May 16, 2018 · Anti-Federalists as champions of mass democracy are “unrealistic and unhistori-cal.” 25 . Rather, the Anti-Federalists were localists who were unceasingly skepti-cal of centralized power, and “lacked both the faith and the vision to extend their principles nation-wide.” 26 . Thus, Kenyon’s overarching conclusion concerns the role of ...
Jan 25, 2020 · With that express limitation of federal powers through the Tenth Amendment, while reserving the rest to the states or the people, the Framers spoke to a core Antifederalist concern, the ...
