Search results
Nov 6, 2015 · 1. What Is Meta-ethics? Meta-ethics is a major field of enquiry in philosophy. The ‘meta’ in ‘meta-ethics’ signifies ‘above’. Meta-ethics is the attempt to answer questions about ethics. Philosophers working in this area are not so much concerned with what people or acts in particular are ethical.
Jan 23, 2007 · Metaethics. First published Tue Jan 23, 2007; substantive revision Tue Jan 24, 2023. Metaethics is the attempt to understand the metaphysical, epistemological, semantic, and psychological, presuppositions and commitments of moral thought, talk, and practice.
People also ask
Is metaethics part of moral philosophy?
What is meta-ethics?
Does metaethics overlap with philosophy?
What does'meta-ethics' mean?
Mar 16, 2022 · Metaethics: An Introduction presents a clear and engaging survey of the key concepts and positions in what has become one of the most exciting and influential fields of philosophy. In a work free of technical language and jargon, Andrew Fisher covers the main ideas that have shaped metaethics from the work of G.E. Moore to the latest thinking.
Meta-ethics is that branch of moral philosophy that concerns itself with analyzing the terms and concepts used in normative ethics. The term “meta” means after or beyond, and, consequently, the notion of meta-ethics involves a removed, or bird’s eye view of the entire project of ethics.
In the general scheme of philosophy, we should note that metaethics is part of moral philosophy. Moral philosophy or ethics is a branch of philosophy that deals with the ultimate questions of morality. There are two sorts of questions that moral philosophy tries to tackle: 1. What is the nature and methodology of moral judgments? 2.
- 517KB
- Jeremiah Joven Joaquin
- 14
- 2013
Mar 10, 2021 · 1. Metaethics: Introduction. The prefix “meta” is derived from the Greek for “beyond”. Metaethics is therefore a form of study that is beyond the topics considered in normative or applied ethics.
Feb 26, 2020 · Metaethics can be described as the philosophical study of the nature of moral judgment. It is concerned with such questions as: Do moral judgments express beliefs or rather desires and inclinations? Are moral judgments apt to be assessed in terms of truth and falsity? Do moral sentences have factual meaning?
