Search results
Jan 23, 2024 · The target organs are indicated on a schematic “virtual human”, who has both male and female organs. The poster is updated after each meeting of the IARC Monographs or IARC Handbooks Working Group at which a new Group 1 agent or cancer-preventive effect is identified, or a new target organ for a known agent or effect is established.
Oct 20, 2011 · The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is part of the World Health Organization. Its mission is to coordinate and conduct research on the causes of human cancer, the mechanisms of carcinogenesis, and to develop scientific strategies for cancer control. The Agency is involved in both epidemiological and laboratory research and ...
Dec 1, 2023 · There was also limited evidence for cancer in humans (renal cell carcinoma and testicular cancer) and strong mechanistic evidence in human primary cells and experimental systems (for epigenetic alterations and immunosuppression, as well as several other key characteristics of carcinogens). PFOS is possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), on ...
carcinogenicity and mechanistic and other relevant data. The terms probably carcinogenic and possibly carcinogenic have no quantitative significance and are used simply as descriptors of different levels of evidence of human carcinogenicity, with probably carcinogenic signifying a higher level of evidence than possibly carcinogenic. Group 2A ...
Jul 19, 2018 · IARC Monograph on Glyphosate Q&A on Glyphosate. DOWNLOAD PDF. In March 2015, IARC classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2A). This was based on “limited” evidence of cancer in humans (from real-world exposures that actually occurred) and “sufficient” evidence of cancer in experimental animals (from studies ...
Jul 14, 2023 · By contrast, alcoholic beverages fall into the most extreme classification: “carcinogenic to humans.” The IARC also classifies air pollution, tobacco and processed meats as carcinogenic to humans.
May 31, 2011 · In slightly clearer terms, that means cell-phone radiation is “possibly carcinogenic” to human beings. “A review of the human evidence of epidemiological studies shows an increased risk of glioma and malignant types of brain cancer in association with wireless-phone use,” Dr. Jonathan Samet, the chairperson of the IARC working group ...
