Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Aug 19, 2023 · The dissolution of Austria-Hungary marked the end of one of Europe’s great empires. It had been a major power for centuries and had dominated central and eastern Europe. Its collapse left a power vacuum in the region, and the formation of new nation-states led to further political instability.

    • Introduction↑
    • A Discussion About Sources↑
    • Definitions and Evaluation of Soldiers Killed↑
    • War Wounded↑
    • Civilian Losses↑
    • Conclusion↑

    The issue of war losses is an intricate one, involving several crucial points. First, words matter. The meaning of words such as “killed in action”, “wounded” or “casualties”, which are the main headings in table columns in books or articles dealing with war losses, are misleading. Take the wounded: some died, others did not, meaning that the total...

    Military statistics serve as the main sources: various armies originally published the following figures of soldiers killed. The exact origin of these statistics is key to any discussion of war losses, with four consequences. First: As our main sources are armies, it is impossible to calculate war losses by nations orempires. After the war, politic...

    Before beginning any evaluation of the war’s military losses, a precise delimitation of those considered soldiers who died in the war is needed, for it is all but clear. One question is easy to solve: that of POWs. Obviously, POWs have to be taken into account: they were soldiers, large numbers of whom died in the camps. In some cases, including th...

    Statistics about those who were wounded but did not die from their wounds are more doubtful than those of soldiers killed in action or those who died from wounds, for two main reasons. First, there are many kinds of war wounds. A soldier who cut the tip of his little finger in barbed wireand became infected was formally a wounded soldier. Did he be...

    Military losses tend to be much better documented than civilian deaths in wartime. As armies needed as precise an estimate as possible of the men available for combat, they counted only soldiers. Civilian administrators had to care for the sick and bury the dead, whatever their cause of illness or death. No office, anywhere, registered civilian war...

    To conclude: these statistical insights suggest an asymmetric double contrast. On the front line, the Allies paid the highest price, both in terms of those killed in action and those wounded. But on the home front, the Central Powers and Russia paid a much higher toll. War was not only a military matter; it was an ordeal for whole societies. Antoin...

  2. People also ask

  3. Sep 16, 2016 · Estimates of the total losses of the Austro-Hungarian armed forces range from 1.1 to 1.2 million in addition to 450,000 deceased prisoners of war and 300,000 soldiers who stayed missed after war. The number of direct and indirect civilian losses is completely unknown.

  4. By the end of September 1916, Austria–Hungary mobilized and concentrated new divisions, and the successful Russian advance was halted and slowly repelled; but the Austrian armies took heavy losses (about 1 million men) and never recovered.

  5. Hungary. The following estimates of Hungarian deaths, within contemporary borders, during World War I were made by a Russian historian in a 2004 handbook of human losses in the 20th century. Total dead 385,000: including military losses 270,000 with the Austro-Hungarian forces and POW deaths in captivity of 70,000.

  6. Apr 8, 2021 · The indexing of the casualty lists of World War I Austria-Hungary is progressing well. Today we could finish the year 1917. Now the years 1914 to 1917 and also the few lists published in 1919 are complete.

  7. Using data from the latest historical and demographic research on military and civilian losses, the author compares the carnage of the First World War with another great scourge, that of infant mortality, whose order of magnitude was similar.