Search results
Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source/free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ .
- Version 2.0
means either the GNU General Public License, Version 2.0,...
- MPL 1.1
means Covered Code in any form other than Source Code. 1.6....
- Mozilla Licensing Policies
Mozilla Monitor. See if your email has appeared in a...
- Appropriate Header Text
Mozilla License Headers This page gives copy-and-pasteable...
- Historical Documents
MPL 1.1 is obsoleted by MPL 2.0, and Mozilla strongly...
- Version 2.0
The Mozilla Public License (MPL) is a free and open-source weak copyleft license for most Mozilla Foundation software such as Firefox and Thunderbird.
- January 3, 2012
- Mozilla Foundation
People also ask
Does the Mozilla Foundation have an open source license?
Does Mozilla have an open source license?
Do you know the Mozilla Foundation?
What is the difference between Apache License and Mozilla license?
- Illa Public License 2.0 Requirements
- Illa Public License 2.0 vs. Other Weak Copyleft Licenses
- Illa Public License 2.0 Use Cases
- Future of The Mozilla Public License 2.0
Open source software licenses fall into two categories: permissive and copyleft. Copyleft licenses, in turn, come in two flavors: strong and weak. The Mozilla Public License 2.0 is in the latter group. The difference between the two forms of copyleft licenses lies in the scope of source code to be shared. Strong copyleft licenses like GPL v2 and GP...
Other weak copyleft licenses include the GNU Lesser Public License (LGPL), the Eclipse Public License (EPL), and the Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL). In this section, we’ll compare both with the Mozilla Public License 2.0.
Weak copyleft licenses like the Mozilla Public License 2.0 fill a niche between strong copyleft licenses, such as the GPLs, and permissive ones like MIT or Apache License 2.0. As a result, it serves specific use cases for both authors and companies that rely on open source software.
One recent examinationof projects on GitHub found that approximately 1.4% of works on the platform used the Mozilla Public License 2.0. It was the only weak copyleft license present in any significant number of projects. Couple this fact with its positioning as a “bridge” between GPL-like licenses and permissive ones, and it’s clear MPL 2.0 present...
Jan 30, 2024 · Q1: What is the Mozilla Public License? The MPL is a simple copyleft license. The MPL's "file-level" copyleft is designed to encourage contributors to share modifications they make to your code, while still allowing them to combine your code with code under other licenses (open or proprietary) with minimal restrictions.
MPL 1.1 FAQ- HISTORICAL USE ONLY. Français (une version plus tôt) This is an outdated FAQ, and is retained only for historical purposes. The FAQ for MPL 2.0 is here. This is the Mozilla MPL FAQ. It aims to answer the most common questions people have about using and distributing code under the MPL.
The Mozilla Public License 1.1 (MPL 1.1) In January, 1998, Netscape Communications decided to release the binary code of its Communicator web-brower for free. Less than 24 hours later, it decided to release the Communicator source code as well.
The MPL is the license for Mozilla Firefox, Mozilla Thunderbird, and most other Mozilla software, [5] but it has been used by others, such as Adobe to license their Flex product line, [6] and The Document Foundation to license LibreOffice 4.0 (also on LGPL 3+).
