Search results
About the License. Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source / free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ.
- Version 2.0
Version 2.0. 1. Definitions. 1.1. “Contributor”. means each...
- MPL 1.1
the licenses granted in this Section 2.1 and are effective...
- Mozilla Licensing Policies
Mozilla Monitor. See if your email has appeared in a...
- Appropriate Header Text
Mozilla License Headers This page gives copy-and-pasteable...
- Historical Documents
These files are made available for historical and reference...
- Version 2.0
The Mozilla Public License (MPL) is a free and open-source weak copyleft license for most Mozilla Foundation software such as Firefox and Thunderbird. The MPL license is developed and maintained by Mozilla, which seeks to balance the concerns of both open-source and proprietary developers; it is distinguished from others as a middle ground between the permissive software BSD-style licenses and ...
- January 3, 2012
- Mozilla Foundation
People also ask
What is the Mozilla Public License?
What is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2 FAQ?
Is Mozilla a free software license?
Does the Mozilla Foundation have an open source license?
Some similar questions are probably already answered here, but they answered for different licenses (like Apache-2.0). I would like to have a more understandable explanation about MPL-2.0 pros and cons in one place. licensing. license-compatibility. license-recommendation.
- Illa Public License 2.0 Requirements
- Illa Public License 2.0 vs. Other Weak Copyleft Licenses
- Illa Public License 2.0 Use Cases
- Future of The Mozilla Public License 2.0
Open source software licenses fall into two categories: permissive and copyleft. Copyleft licenses, in turn, come in two flavors: strong and weak. The Mozilla Public License 2.0 is in the latter group. The difference between the two forms of copyleft licenses lies in the scope of source code to be shared. Strong copyleft licenses like GPL v2 and GP...
Other weak copyleft licenses include the GNU Lesser Public License (LGPL), the Eclipse Public License (EPL), and the Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL). In this section, we’ll compare both with the Mozilla Public License 2.0.
Weak copyleft licenses like the Mozilla Public License 2.0 fill a niche between strong copyleft licenses, such as the GPLs, and permissive ones like MIT or Apache License 2.0. As a result, it serves specific use cases for both authors and companies that rely on open source software.
One recent examinationof projects on GitHub found that approximately 1.4% of works on the platform used the Mozilla Public License 2.0. It was the only weak copyleft license present in any significant number of projects. Couple this fact with its positioning as a “bridge” between GPL-like licenses and permissive ones, and it’s clear MPL 2.0 present...
Jan 30, 2024 · This is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0 FAQ. It aims to answer the most common questions people have about using and distributing code under the MPL. Please note that, while this FAQ is intended to be accurate and helpful, it is not the license, and may not cover important issues that affect you and your specific situation.
Mar 6, 2012 · On 3rd January 2012, version 2 of the Mozilla Public License (MPL) was approved by the Open Source Initiative. It is also considered to be a Free Software licence by the Free Software Foundation. Like its predecessor, the Mozilla Public License v 1.1, it seeks to impose a moderate level of ‘copyleft’ restriction on adaptations of code that ...
