Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. • • MPL 2.0 makes compliance simpler, both for you and for people who receive code from you. MPL 2.0 provides patent protections for you and your contributors more in line with those of other open source licenses, and allows your entire community to protect any contributor if the contributor is sued.
     www.mozilla.org › MPL › 2

     About MPL 2.0: Revision Process and Changes FAQ — Mozilla

2. People also ask

   What is the Mozilla Public License?

   • Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source / free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ.

   Mozilla Public Licence — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/

   See all results for this question

   What is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2 FAQ?

   • This is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0 FAQ. It aims to answer the most common questions people have about using and distributing code under the MPL. Please note that, while this FAQ is intended to be accurate and helpful, it is not the license, and may not cover important issues that affect you and your specific situation.

   MPL 2.0 FAQ — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/FAQ/

   See all results for this question

   Does the Mozilla Foundation have an open source license?

   • It’s therefore no surprise that the Mozilla Foundation has created its own open source license, the Mozilla Public License. Version 1.0 of the Mozilla Public License (MPL) was released in 1998, with a slightly modified Version 1.1 introduced the following year.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   Does Mozilla have an open source license?

   • Open source software contributors, however, may also know Mozilla for its commitment to keeping the internet a free and public resource, a mission that matches the ethos of OSS development. It’s therefore no surprise that the Mozilla Foundation has created its own open source license, the Mozilla Public License.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

3. www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPLMPL 2.0 FAQ — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPL

   • Cached

   Jan 30, 2024 · About MPL. Q1: What is the Mozilla Public License? The MPL is a simple copyleft license. The MPL's "file-level" copyleft is designed to encourage contributors to share modifications they make to your code, while still allowing them to combine your code with code under other licenses (open or proprietary) with minimal restrictions.

4. opensource.stackexchange.com › questions › 8831licensing - Pros and Cons of using MPL-2.0 license? - Open ...

   opensource.stackexchange.com › questions › 8831

   • Cached

   The MPL license is a copyleft license, which means that in principle people are not allowed to distribute code that is under the MPL-2.0 license under different terms. The GPL licenses (including LGPL and AGPL) require that the entire application is distributed under the terms of the GPL license.

5. Videos

   • 

     3:26

     youtube.com

     MPL (Mozilla Public License) Open Source license in a nutshell

     Jun 18, 2021

     4.4K Views

   • 

     4:56

     youtube.com

     Mozilla Public License (MPL 2.0) vs Lesser GNU General Public License (LGPL 3.0)

     Sep 18, 2022

     113 Views

   • 

     7:52

     youtube.com

     Which Open Source license should I use? MiT Apache GNU GPL Mozilla

     May 5, 2021

     4K Views

   View all

6. fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101

   • Cached

   Apr 5, 2021 · Often termed a “weak copyleft” license, MPL 2.0 falls somewhere in the middle. So, what makes Mozilla Public License 2.0 distinctive, and why might an OSS user or author like the MPL 2.0? We’ll address these questions and more below. Mozilla Public License 2.0 Requirements

7. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mozilla_Public_LicenseMozilla Public License - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mozilla_Public_License

   • Cached

   : 10.2 If code under version 1.0 or 1.1 is upgraded to version 2.0 by this mechanism, the 1.x-covered code must be marked with the aforementioned GPL-incompatible notice. The MPL can be modified to form a new license, provided that said license does not refer to Mozilla or Netscape.

8. www.fsf.org › blogs › licensingThe Mozilla Public License version 2.0 is out—and GPL ...

   www.fsf.org › blogs › licensing

   • Cached

   Jan 5, 2012 · Earlier this week, the Mozilla Foundation published the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0. This is a major update to their flagship license, which covers most of the Foundation's own free software projects, as well as others'. This release caps off a two-year update process.