If you haven’t already, download, install and start using Opera today!
- Opera Vs Firefox
Extend your desktop battery life by
up to 50% compared to other ...
- Opera for Mac
Find the Best Deals Online Now.
Huge Selection of Seating ...
- Currency converter
Fast & Easy to Use. Buy Your
Tickets Online Now!
- Opera for Linux
Find the Best Deals Online Now.
Huge Selection at Great Prices!
- Opera Vs Firefox
Mozilla Public License 2.0. Website. vpn .mozilla .org. Mozilla VPN is an open-source virtual private network web browser extension, desktop application, and mobile application developed by Mozilla. It launched in beta as Firefox Private Network on September 10, 2019, and officially launched on July 15, 2020 as Mozilla VPN.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_VPN
The Mozilla Public License (MPL) is a free and open-source software license developed and maintained by the Mozilla Foundation. It is a weak copyleft license, characterized as a middle ground between permissive software licenses and the GNU General Public License (GPL), that seeks to balance the concerns of proprietary and open-source developers.
Mozilla (stylized as moz://a) is a free software community founded in 1998 by members of Netscape.The Mozilla community uses, develops, spreads and supports Mozilla products, thereby promoting exclusively free software and open standards, with only minor exceptions.
People also ask
Which is the best description of the Mozilla Public License?
How do I apply the Mozilla Public License?
Who is responsible for maintaining the Mozilla MPL?
What kind of license does Mozilla Thunderbird use?
Mozilla Public License 2.0. Website. vpn .mozilla .org. Mozilla VPN is an open-source virtual private network web browser extension, desktop application, and mobile application developed by Mozilla. It launched in beta as Firefox Private Network on September 10, 2019, and officially launched on July 15, 2020 as Mozilla VPN.
A Mozilla executive stated that Quantum was the "biggest update" to the browser since version 1.0. On May 3, 2019, the expiration of an intermediate signing certificate caused Firefox to automatically disable and lock all browser extensions (add-ons).
- 97 languages
- 200 MB
- September 23, 2002; 19 years ago
- MPL 2.0
This is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0 FAQ. It aims to answer the most common questions people have about using and distributing code under the MPL. Please note that, while this FAQ is intended to be accurate and helpful, it is not the license, and may not cover important issues that affect you and your specific situation.
- MPL Future
- Sion 2.0 & Article Rewrite
- Relation to Apache
- Any Other "Non-Infective" Copyleft License?
- Notable Users Section Considered Unnotable?
- External Links Modified
British spelling of "licence" vs American spelling of "license". Do we care, since Mozilla is based out of California? Andytuba (talk) 03:57, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps there should be information on the latest version of the MPL? See website: http://mpl.mozilla.org/ 220.127.116.11 (talk) 02:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Currently, the article mostly describes version 1.1 of the MPL, but with the recent upgrade to version 2.0, a lot of the information has changed. I've drawn up a rewrite to better reflect version 2.0, improve sections and attributions, and clear out things like dead links. I'm going to update the article by section, spaced out over several days to allow feedback, and then lastly tweak the formatting. If at first it seems like I've removed a fact, I probably just moved it to a new section. Besides extreme details about how version 1.1 worked, the only other facts I've cut are: 1. Mentioning OpenSolaris 2. The process boundary of the GPL 3. Mentioning Netscape 6 The first could still be reached on the CDDL page, and it seemed to imply that OpenSolaris was Sun's only CDDL-licensed software. The last two are both interesting facts, but I couldn't find clear citations for either and thought the right wording and links should convey the "file boundary" and "propietary module" concepts fin...
Besides Version 3 of the GPL and several derivative licenses, the latest version of the Apache License was drafted after version 1.1 of the MPL. If you compare versions 2.0 and 1.1 of the Apache License, the revision definitely "looks" more like the MPL (legal structure, patent clauses, etc.) but I couldn't find anyone explicitly saying that the MPL influenced Apache License 2.0. Couldn't find much of anything about the Apache revision process for that matter. If someone knew where to find out if there was an influence, it might be an interesting fact to put in both this and the Apache License article. Zar2gar1 (talk) 17:48, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
I'm interested to know if there are other licenses that require perpetual copyleft for just the covered source code (without requirements on other source code components). I know LGPL permits combining works when done by the linker, but that sounds like a special case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 19:50, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
I question if there is any encyclopedic value to keeping this section, or if it can be removed or rewritten in prose. The lead section already describes how Mozilla's software uses this license. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on Mozilla Public License. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes: 1. Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080628174020/http://www.mozilla.org/mozilla-at-one.html to http://www.mozilla.org/mozilla-at-one.html 2. Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110105015147/http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/NPL-1.0M-FAQ.html to http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/NPL-1.0M-FAQ.html When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions...