Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Mar 28, 2024 · Authoritarian regimes are systems of government that have no established mechanism for the transfer of executive power and do not afford their citizens civil liberties or political rights. Power is concentrated in the hands of a single leader or a small elite, whose decisions are taken without regard for the will of the people.

    • Natasha Lindstaedt
  2. According to Barbara Geddes, there are seven typologies of authoritarian regimes: dominant party regimes, military regime, personalist regimes, monarchies, oligarchic regimes, indirect military regimes, or hybrids of the first three.

  3. Aug 6, 2015 · According to Linz, authoritarian regimes are characterized by four defining traits: (1) limited, nonresponsible, political pluralism; (2) the absence of an elaborate and guiding ideology, having instead “distinctive mentalities”; (3) the absence of both intensive and extensive political mobilization; and (4) the exercise of power within ...

  4. eyes of many, of SAPs—in many African countries that international donors began once again to consider that democracy might be a necessary condition of development.4 Examples of the purported effectiveness of authoritarian regimes in advancing development can be traced to the success of Brazil in the 1930s and 1940s (during the.

  5. People also ask

  6. A NEW TYPOLOGY OF AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES When trying to develop a typology of authoritarian regimes, we first face the problem of how to identify the type. This presupposes a qualitative (dichotomous) distinction between democracy and autocracy. It could be argued that it is an advantage,

    • 585KB
    • 39
  7. Jun 24, 2021 · A theoretical framework will be outlined, allowing to identify situational and contextual influences on authoritarianism on three different levels: the macro-level (the society), the meso-level (institutions such as schools and peers), and the micro-level (individuals and their families).

  8. Jul 28, 2015 · Presents the literature in terms of five mechanisms through which authoritarian rulers use such institutions for their own purposes: signaling, information acquisition, patronage distribution, monitoring, and credible commitment.