Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Jan 23, 2007 · Metaethics is the attempt to understand the metaphysical, epistemological, semantic, and psychological, presuppositions and commitments of moral thought, talk, and practice. As such, it counts within its domain a broad range of questions and puzzles, including: Is morality more a matter of taste than truth? Are moral standards culturally relative?

  2. Feb 19, 2004 · The first point is a form of metaethical relativism: It says one morality may be true for one society and a conflicting morality may be true for another society. Hence, there is no one objectively correct morality for all societies. The second point, however, is a concession to moral objectivism.

  3. People also ask

  4. Here the interest is in evaluating moral and ethical theories and systems. For example, moral relativism is a meta-ethical theory because it interprets discussions around ethics; a question asked within moral relativism is "is ethics culturally relative?"

  5. Nov 30, 2021 · This section introduces descriptive relativism, deep moral disagreement, and the semantic challenge against moral realism that is based on it. Descriptive ethical relativism is the view that, as a matter of empirical fact, people's moral convictions differ drastically across different geographies, societies, cultures, or periods.

  6. These are some of the reasons why the concept of ‘context’ has been given a central place in the developing meta-ethical stance that we have coined ‘contextual ethics’.

    • Anne-Marie Søndergaard Christensen
  7. First, it holds that descriptive, prescriptive, or meta-ethical aspects of prescriptive terms such as ‘right,’ ‘wrong,’ ‘ought,’ etc., (e.g., their use, legitimacy, or meaning) are relative to a moral view.

  8. Meta-Ethical Moral Relativism: There are no objective moral facts or properties, but moral facts and properties do exist in such a way as to depend on certain contextual parameters related to the individuals or groups forming moral judgments.