Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Jan 23, 2007 · Metaethics is the attempt to understand the metaphysical, epistemological, semantic, and psychological, presuppositions and commitments of moral thought, talk, and practice. As such, it counts within its domain a broad range of questions and puzzles, including: Is morality more a matter of taste than truth?

  2. Mar 10, 2021 · Metaethics is the study of how we engage in ethics. Thus, the metaethicist has a role more similar to a football commentator rather than to a referee or player. The metaethicist judges and comments on how the ethical game is being played rather than advancing practical arguments, or kicking the football, themselves.

  3. May 31, 2011 · Among naturalist philosophers, both defenders and opponents of moral relativism argue that prescriptive moral theories (or normative theories) should be constrained by empirical findings about human psychology. Empiricists have asked if people are or can be moral relativists, and what effect being a moral relativist can have on an individual’s moral functioning. This research is ...

  4. Jan 1, 2013 · The moral universalism-relativism debate. Katinka J.P. Quintelier. (Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research) Delphine De Smet. (Ghent University) Daniel M.T. Fessler ...

  5. Abstract. Discusses three forms of moral relativism—normative moral relativism, moral judgement relativism, and metaethical relativism. After discussing objections to each view, it is shown that the objections can all be met and that all three versions of moral relativism are correct. Keywords: metaethical relativism, moral judgement ...

  6. Meta-ethics: addresses questions about first-order (normative) ethical judgments, e.g., about the nature of morality; the meaning of moral talk; whether morality is absolute or relative; whether moral judgments can be true or false (objective) or merely subjective, how we can have knowledge of moral truth. 2. The Problem of Moral Relativism

  7. On its semantic construal, metaethical relativism builds on the idea that the truth value of moral claims is relative to a special parameter, which, depending on the theory, may be a set of moral norms, codes, standards or considerations, proper to an agent or shared by a group, society, culture, what not.