Yahoo Web Search

  1. About 4,300,000 search results
    • What is meta-ethics relativism?

      • Meta-ethical relativists, in general, believe that the descriptive properties of terms such as "good", "bad", "right", and "wrong" do not stand subject to universal truth conditions, but only to societal convention and personal preference.
  1. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Meta-ethicsMeta-ethics - Wikipedia

    Meta-ethics. In metaphilosophy and ethics, meta-ethics is the study of the nature, scope, and meaning of moral judgment. It is one of the three branches of ethics generally studied by philosophers, the others being normative ethics (questions of how one ought to be and act) and applied ethics (practical questions of right behavior in given ...

    • Overview
    • Meta-ethical questions
    • Meta-ethical theories

    Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social | Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology | Philosophy Index: Aesthetics · Epistemology · Ethics · Logic · Metaphysics · Consciousness · Philosophy of...

    Examples of meta-ethical questions include: What does it mean to say something is "good"? How, if at all, do we know what is right and wrong? How do moral attitudes motivate action? Are there objective or absolute values? What is the source of our values?

    A meta-ethical theory, unlike a normative ethical theory, does not contain any ethical evaluations. An answer to any of the five example questions above would not itself be an ethical statement. The major meta-ethical views are commonly divided into realist and anti-realist views: Moral realism holds that there are objective values. Realists believ...

  2. People also ask

    What is meta-ethics relativism?

    What is the difference between moral relativism and ethical relativism?

    What is meta ethical theory in ethics?

    What is ethical relativism according to Herodotus?

  3. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Postmodern_relativismRelativism - Wikipedia

    Alethic relativism(also factual relativism) is the doctrine that there are no absolute truths, i.e., that truth is always relative to some particular frame of reference, such as a language or a culture (cultural relativism).[5] Some forms of relativism also bear a resemblance to philosophical skepticism.[6]

  4. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Religious_relativismMoral relativism - Wikipedia

    Meta-ethical moral relativists believe not only that people disagree about moral issues, but that terms such as "good", "bad", "right" and "wrong" do not stand subject to universaltruthconditions at all; rather, they are relative to the traditions, convictions, or practices of an individual or a group of people.[5]

  5. Aug 01, 1992 · Ethical relativism is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture. That is, whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. The same action may be morally right in one society but be morally wrong in another. For the ethical relativist, there are no ...

  6. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › EthicsEthics - Wikipedia

    Meta-ethics is the branch of philosophical ethics that asks how we understand, know about, and what we mean when we talk about what is right and what is wrong. An ethical question pertaining to a particular practical situation—such as, "Should I eat this particular piece of chocolate cake?"—cannot be a meta-ethical question (rather, this is an applied ethical question).

  1. People also search for