Yahoo Web Search

  1. About 187,000 search results

  1. Jan 23, 2007 · Metaethics First published Tue Jan 23, 2007; substantive revision Tue Jan 24, 2023 Metaethics is the attempt to understand the metaphysical, epistemological, semantic, and psychological, presuppositions and commitments of moral thought, talk, and practice.

  2. Jan 22, 2018 · In this article, we would like to focus on the phenomenon of moral relativism regarding spatiotemporal distance as an entry point to the nature of folk moral relativism and the methodology of meta-ethics. To do so, we first introduce Williams’ relativism of distance.

  3. Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint (for instance, that of a culture or a historical period) and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others.

  4. Jan 23, 2004 · Non-cognitivism is a variety of irrealism about ethics with a number of influential variants. Non-cognitivists agree with error theorists that there are no moral properties or moral facts.

  5. meta-ethical judgments about whether the claim is univer- ... psychology, relativism, universalism 1 | INTRODUCTION ... 18 September 2018 Accepted: 2 October 2018 DOI: 10.1111/mila.12232 ...

  6. ethical relativism, the doctrine that there are no absolute truths in ethics and that what is morally right or wrong varies from person to person or from society to society. Arguments for ethical relativism

  7. The extent to which individuals treat ethical beliefs as objective was predicted by the way they grounded their ethical systems. Groundings which emphasize the religious, pragmatic, and self-identity underpinnings of ethical belief each independently predicted greater ethical objectivity.

  8. Feb 2, 2008 · Psychology Journal of Business Ethics Ethics position theory (EPT) maintains that individuals’ personal moral philosophies influence their judgments, actions, and emotions in ethically intense situations.

  9. Descriptive moral relativism holds only that some people do in fact disagree about what is moral; meta-ethical moral relativism holds that in such disagreements, nobody is objectively right or wrong; and normative moral relativism holds that because nobody is right or wrong, we ought to tolerate the behavior of others even when we disagree about...

  10. References Meta-ethics is a major field of enquiry in philosophy. The 'meta' in 'meta-ethics' signifies 'above'. Meta-ethics is the attempt to answer questions about ethics. Philosophers working in this area are not so much concerned with what people or acts in particular are ethical.

  11. Nov 21, 2007 · Because deontological theories are best understood in contrast to consequentialist ones, a brief look at consequentialism and a survey of the problems with it that motivate its deontological opponents, provides a helpful prelude to taking up deontological theories themselves.

  12. Aug 11, 2022 · Ethical relativism refers to lacking absolute moral laws that govern the whole society. Every deed done cannot be judged by one universal moral standard but should be judged according to the norms of that culture. In one culture, it may be right to kill, but in another, killing may be heinous and a sin.

  13. If morality is not relative to culture, as we discussed in yesterday’s post, might it be relative to a person’s beliefs, attitudes, emotions, opinions, desires, wants, etc.? Personal relativism is a theory that holds that moral judgments are relative to, conditioned by, or dependent upon, individuals. This theory has ancient roots, but it ...

  1. People also search for