Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Jan 23, 2007 · Metaethics. First published Tue Jan 23, 2007; substantive revision Tue Jan 24, 2023. Metaethics is the attempt to understand the metaphysical, epistemological, semantic, and psychological, presuppositions and commitments of moral thought, talk, and practice. As such, it counts within its domain a broad range of questions and puzzles, including ...

  2. Metaethics. Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words. Whereas the fields of applied ethics and normative theory focus on what is moral, metaethics focuses on what morality itself is. Just as two people may disagree about the ethics of, for example ...

  3. Metaethics is the branch of ethics that examines the nature and justification of moral judgments and theories. Learn about the main metaethical theories, such as naturalism, nonnaturalism, emotivism and prescriptivism, and the naturalistic fallacy.

    • The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
  4. People also ask

  5. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › MetaethicsMetaethics - Wikipedia

    t. e. In metaphilosophy and ethics, metaethics is the study of the nature, scope, and meaning of moral judgment. It is one of the three branches of ethics generally studied by philosophers, the others being normative ethics (questions of how one ought to be and act) and applied ethics (practical questions of right behavior in given, usually ...

  6. Metaethics is the branch of ethics that explores the presuppositions and foundations of moral reasoning and values. Learn about the meaning of ontology of value, the difference between realism and anti-realism, and the role of God, nature, and society in moral theory.

  7. Feb 26, 2020 · Metaethics is the philosophical study of the nature of moral judgment. It explores questions such as: Are moral judgments true or false? Are they expressions of beliefs or desires? Are they objective or subjective?

  8. Mar 10, 2021 · Metaethics is the study of how we engage in ethics. Thus, the metaethicist has a role more similar to a football commentator rather than to a referee or player. The metaethicist judges and comments on how the ethical game is being played rather than advancing practical arguments, or kicking the football, themselves.

  1. People also search for