Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

    • The History of Objectivity
    • The History of Morality
    • The Arguments For and Against Objective Morality
    • A Word from Verywell

    The idea of objective morality has been around for centuries. It is the opposite of subjective morality, which is the view that morals can very from person to person. The idea of objectivity is one that has been discussed since ancient times, from Mohism in ancient China (479-221 BCE) to Plato and Aristotle in ancient Greece (427-322 BCE).

    The idea of morality transcends humans. For example, research in neuroscience and animal ecology suggest that some animals have a primitive sense of morality, such as chimpanzees punishing other chimps for violating rules of the social order and animals demonstrating empathetic behaviors towards others such as rhesus monkeys refusing to dispense el...

    Because objective morality can't be determined, hands down, as definitely existing or not, some people believe in it, and others do not. There are arguments to be made both ways.

    Every day, we are faced with decisions to make about how we behave in the world. Whether objective morality exists or not, we all have an inner sense of right and wrong and of good and bad. Following that inner sense is your best bet to living well and being a kind person even though morality may or may not be objective. You are allowed to decide f...

  2. Moral universalism (also called moral objectivism) is the meta-ethical position that some system of ethics, or a universal ethic, applies universally, that is, for "all similarly situated individuals", [1] regardless of culture, race, sex, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other distinguishing feature. [2]

  3. Jan 15, 2021 · Moral Objectivism. The view that moral facts exist, in the sense that they hold for everyone, is called moral (or ethical) objectivism. From the viewpoint of objectivism, moral facts do not merely represent the beliefs of the person making the claim, they are facts of the world.

  4. Moral Objectivity and Moral Relativism. Relativism holds that moral claims contain an essential indexical element, such that the truth of any such claim requires relativization to some individual or group.

  5. Moral objectivism, as I use the term, is the view that a single set of principles determines the permissibility of any action, and the correctness of any judgment regarding an actions permissibility. Does this view deserve the label ‘moral objectivism?’

  6. Feb 4, 2003 · Moral Epistemology. First published Tue Feb 4, 2003; substantive revision Sun May 12, 2024. How is moral knowledge possible? This question is central in moral epistemology and marks a cluster of problems. The most important are the following.

  1. People also search for