Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Jan 5, 2021 · Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-...

    • Jan 5, 2021
    • 343
    • Quimbee
  2. The Plaintiff, Haines (the "Plaintiff"), was an owner of land who wished to construct 50 homes. The Plaintiff applied to the Defendant for permits to connect the lots to existing sewer lines. The Defendant refused, citing that the plant was already operating at full capacity. The Plaintiff brought suit for declaratory and injunctive relief, and ...

  3. Apr 6, 2024 · Facts of the Case. The Line Item Veto Act granted the President power to cancel specific budget items after signing them into law. President Clinton (defendant) exercised this power to cancel a provision in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, which would have allowed New York (plaintiff) to avoid repaying certain health care funds.

  4. Facts. Appellant, President Clinton, exercised his power under the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 by canceling two provisions in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 that adversely affected New York. Appellees, New York City and several private organizations, challenged the constitutionality of the cancellations. The Supreme Court of the United States ...

  5. Brief of respondent RuthAnne Visnauskas, Commissioner of New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal in opposition filed. Aug 09 2023. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023. Aug 09 2023. Reply of petitioners Community Housing Improvement Program, et al. filed. (Distributed) Oct 02 2023.

  6. Nov 16, 2012 · Friday, November 16, 2012. Riss v. City of New York case brief. Riss v. City of New York case summary. 22 N.Y. 2d (1968) FACTS. -Riss sued the City of New York for negligence alleging that the police failed to provide her with protection. -She was terrorized for months by an old boyfriend who had threatened to kill or maim her.

  7. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981) New York v. Belton No. 80-328 Argued April 27, 1981 Decided July 1, 1981 453 U.S. 454 CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK Syllabus An automobile in which respondent was one of the occupants was stopped by a New York State policeman for traveling at an excessive rate of speed.

  1. People also search for