Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Jun 30, 2017 · In the space below, I provide a brief summary of the United States v. Nixon case, its understandable result, some weaknesses in its reasoning, and some lessons we should learn if and when the current investigations touching the president bring some of these privilege issues back to the Court. Background on the Nixon Case. The United States v.

  2. Apr 27, 2012 · The Senate committee also uncovered the sensational fact that Nixon had installed a secret taping system in the White House; the tapes ultimately revealed Nixon to be the chief operating officer ...

    • Ron Rosenbaum
  3. People also ask

  4. Apr 22, 1974 · Some former Nixon associates offer a plausible theory to explain why the tapes were kept available in the White House as the Watergate scandal unfolded and before the public was aware of the ...

  5. Mar 29, 1977 · By Morton Mintz. March 28, 1977 at 7:00 p.m. EST. The Supreme Court agreed yesterday to hear arguments on whether Watergate tape recordings made by President Nixon in the White House can be...

  6. United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court unanimously ordered President Richard Nixon to deliver tape recordings and other subpoenaed materials related to the Watergate scandal to a federal district court.

    • Burger, joined by Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell
  7. Oct 12, 2018 · “Watergate” improves markedly as use of the tapes recedes, peaking with its dramatic framing of the Saturday Night Massacre – when Nixon moved to fire special prosecutor Archibald Cox,...

  8. This confidentiality agreement stated that both Richard Nixon and the General Service Administration could not access the former President's tapes and documents located near his California home without each party's respective consent.