Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Oct 18, 2017 · Although the No Child Left Behind Act was replaced in 2015, there are still pros and cons to examine of this legislation because its remnants are still being enforced by states at the local district level. List of the Pros of No Child Left Behind. 1. It added structure to educational programs nationwide.

  2. Apr 9, 2022 · What Is No Child Left Behind? No Child Left Behind was first introduced as House Resolution 1 during the 107th Congress in March of 2001. The No Child Left Behind Act aimed to ensure that all students, regardless of race or socioeconomic status, would have the opportunity for a solid education.

    • what were two of the goals for no child left behind act pros and cons1
    • what were two of the goals for no child left behind act pros and cons2
    • what were two of the goals for no child left behind act pros and cons3
    • what were two of the goals for no child left behind act pros and cons4
    • what were two of the goals for no child left behind act pros and cons5
  3. People also ask

  4. The No Child Left Behind Act implemented new educational goals for American society, and placed a great deal of accountability on individual schools to see that these goals were met.

    • The History of NCLB
    • Report Cards
    • Teacher Qualifications
    • Funding
    • Reading First Grants
    • The Effects of NCLB
    • The Future of NCLB
    • High Standards For Academic Achievement
    • Accountability
    • Teacher Quality

    NCLB’s central goal of improving the educational outcome for all students means just that . . . allstudents. Through the use of standardized tests, each school district and each school assess the entire student population to ensure that the school as a whole is moving toward “proficiency.” The students’ performance on the standardized tests is used...

    States and school districts are required to produce report cards, accounting for each school’s scores for statewide testing. The report cards are made public and are meant to assist in closing the achievement gap among states, school districts, schools, and subgroups.

    Every new teacher has to be “highly qualified” in his/her subject, meaning he/she has to have at least a bachelor’s degree and pass a state test in his/her subject area. The qualification standards are also required for paraprofessionals. In order to be considered “highly qualified,” paraprofessionals must either (1) have completed two years of col...

    NCLB included provisions to increase funding where necessary, in an effort to give disadvantaged schools more money. The funding would then be used to implement research-based teaching programs and teacher trainings in schools in an effort to improve scores.

    NCLB created Reading First Grants, which assist schools, especially those in high-poverty areas, in creating research-based reading programs for kindergarten through third-grade students. Reading First Grants will fund reading programs for ninety-minute blocks, five days a week, and will also be used to fund teacher training.

    After ten years under NCLB, how have schools fared? According to the Center for Education Policy (CEP), for the 2010–11 school year, it is estimated that 48 percent of schools did not make AYP. Alexandra Usher, Ctr. for Educ. Policy, AYP Results for 2010–2011 (Dec. 2011).This was an increase over the previous year, which was 39 percent, and was the...

    In the fall of 2011, President Obama announced that the Department of Education would provide states the opportunity to apply for a waiver from certain requirements of NCLB. Calling NCLB “broken” and citing Congress’s failure to fix NCLB through the reauthorization process, the federal government outlined a path for states to enjoy greater flexibil...

    One of the many criticisms of NCLB is that the law allowed each state to define “proficiency.” This, however, means that standards from state to state could be vastly different. It also provided states with an incentive to set the academic bar too low so that these states could meet their AYP and “proficiency” goals more easily. In its explanation ...

    The NCLB accountability provisions solely relied on testing to measure progress toward the ultimate goal of “proficiency.” By emphasizing testing, some unintended consequences resulted, such as (a) narrowing the curriculum to focus on those areas that are being tested; (b) placing greater weight on core skills such reading, writing, and math to the...

    Under NCLB, teacher quality focused on the educational background and certification of teachers while professional development focused on what would be necessary to maintain certification. With ESEA Flexibility, the administration has added layers to improve teacher quality by requiring that states adopt teacher evaluation systems that incorporate ...

  5. The No Child Left Behind Act required states to implement minimum performance benchmarks for students, schools and school districts based on standardized testing. School districts were required to meet performance goals as a prerequisite to receive federal funding.

  6. Apr 24, 2015 · The education law President Bush signed, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), was based on a straight-forward theory: Give schools data and pressure them to improve, and they'll better...

  7. Mar 24, 2010 · Studies suggest that the No Child Left Behind Act's goal of 100 percent of U.S. students proficient in reading and mathematics by 2014 will not be met. Broad implementation guidelines have resulted in a different accountability system in every state.

  1. People also search for