Yahoo Web Search

  1. About 233,000,000 search results
  1. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › WHAT-WGWHATWG - Wikipedia

    The Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group (WHATWG) is a community of people interested in evolving HTML and related technologies. The WHATWG was founded by individuals from Apple Inc., the Mozilla Foundation and Opera Software, leading Web browser vendors, in 2004.

    • 4 June 2004; 17 years ago
    • Developing web standards
  2. Jun 14, 2021 · Welcome to the WHATWG Wiki! You can be a part of our community, making proposals for web standards. This wiki is made available for you for drafting proposals, for writing essays, for keeping track of WHATWG spec-related issues, and so forth. Before you begin, you may wish to read our contribution guidelines. Once you are an autoconfirmed user ...

  3. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Talk:WHATWGTalk:WHATWG - Wikipedia

    • Contributions
    • Canvas
    • Vendor-Neutral
    • History?
    • Applications 1.0
    • Why Does HTML5 Route Here?
    • Chris Wilson
    • Video Autoplay Tag Cancer
    • Potential Updates

    "with the greatest contributors being Mozilla Foundation, Opera Software and Apple Computer." This doesn't appear to be true, the greatest contributions are from Google representatives, and independants. --217.155.143.66 1. See #vendor-neutral. ¦ Reisio19:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 1. 1.1. How does that explain it at all? Contributions is something entirely different from "vendor neutral"... --anne —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anne van Kesteren (talk • contribs) 13:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC).

    Isn't Canvas another WHATWG proposal?--Hhielscher17:37, 28 September 2005 (UTC) 1. Canvas is part of HTML5, I believe. --minghong09:04, 18 October 2005 (UTC) 1. 1.1. Indeed, it is part of HTML5. --anne

    How is the W3C vendor-neutral? --anne 1. Well, let's compare... 1. W3C's info: 1.1. "The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) is an international consortium where Member organizations, a full-time staff, and the public work together to develop Web standards." 1.2. "W3C has over 400 Member organizations from more than 40 countries…, with a broad range of interests…." 1.3. Apparently any organization can apply for membership to the W3C. 1.4. Part of the member agreement states "a. MIT, ERCIM and KEIO shall use diligent efforts to provide the vendor-neutral architectural and administrative leadership required to accomplish the Consortium's goals." 1. WHATWG's info: 1.1. Membership 1. 1.1. Anyone can contribute by subscribing to the mailing list. The list of subscribers to the mailing list are termed the contributors. 1. 1.1. Membership is by invitation only, and consists of a number of representatives from various browser manufacturers. This group, which is referred to as the members, will...

    Can someone shed light on when the WHATWG was first formed, links to earliest discussions, etc? Jeff schiller20:00, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

    "Web Applications 1.0, which defines advanced widgets, like menus and toolbars. This draft is in active development." Well, I've browsed through a specification and I think there is a lot more defined than only "advanced widgets, like menus and toolbars". It also defines things like cross-domain persistent storage or tracking clicking on links (obvious wet dream of advertising companies...). So, I think something should be added to the article regarding this, especially that few of this things are already implemented in at least one popular browser (e.g. support for "ping" attribute is already included and enabled by default in testing builds of Firefox 3 - Gran Paradiso). 193.219.28.14618:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

    HTML5 != WHATWG When I type HTML5 into Wikipedia, I expect to get an article detailing the HTML5 specification. If I wanted a description of the group that makes the HTML5 specification, I would go directly to WHATWG. What gives, this makes absolutely no sense?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gavin86 (talk • contribs) 23:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC). 1. 1.1. This has been fixed now. (Not by me.) 213.236.208.2211:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

    When I go to the pod cast that was cited concerning why Chris Wilson did not chair WHATWG, I find it an insufficient source. The podcast definitely covers Chris's concern about the lack of a patent agreement but later Chris goes on to say that he still intended to take on the position. It sounds like there had to be a bit more to the reason Chris decided not to lead this group as he was pretty interested in the charter. 1. 1.1. Chairing is about the W3C HTML WG. The patent stuff is about the WHATWG. Hsivonen21:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

    Since Autoplay ads now are a cancer and a plague. Questions needed to be asked who demanded autoplay in the standards. I could see Mozilla or another browser company who are paid by ADS to demand this inclusion --2605:6000:3D10:100:ECE3:C570:576F:FD8E (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

    I should not edit this article as I am too close to the source material, but I was told adding a note on the talk page could get things corrected. "WHATWG has a small, invitation-only oversight committee called "Members", which has the power to impeach the editor of the specifications." This is not correct, and the linked source does not support it. This probably refers to the obsolete structure described in https://whatwg.org/charter. "The editor has significant control over the specification, but the community can influence the decisions of the editor." This may benefit from an additional reference to https://whatwg.org/faq#control. "The WHATWG has been actively working on several documents." This list is not exhaustive; it may help to link to https://spec.whatwg.org/which is. I'm unsure whether the goal of this section should be to duplicate that page or not. "The WHATWG specification for HTML is a living document that will have continuous changes as necessary." This applies to a...

  4. www.technopagan.org › WHATWG+wikipedia&FORM=LFACTREWHATWG wikipedia - Bing

    The Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group (WHATWG) is a community of people interested in evolving HTML and related technologies. The WHATWG was founded by individuals from Apple Inc., the Mozilla Foundation and Opera Software, leading Web browser vendors, in 2004.

  5. wiki.whatwg.org › wiki › W3CW3C - WHATWG Wiki

    Jun 25, 2019 · The formation of the WHATWG was a turning point for HTML. Mozilla, Opera and Apple were interested in working together to extend HTML but had to do so outside the W3C. The two main WHATWG specifications were Web Applications 1.0 and Web Forms 2.0.

  6. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › HTML_5HTML5 - Wikipedia

    History. The Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group (WHATWG) began work on the new standard in 2004. At that time, HTML 4.01 had not been updated since 2000, and the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) was focusing future developments on XHTML 2.0.

  7. The Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group (WHATWG) is a community of people interested in evolving HTML and related technologies. The WHATWG was founded by individuals from Apple Inc., the Mozilla Foundation and Opera Software, leading Web browser vendors, in 2004.

  1. People also search for