Search results
Union of India (1978) A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in which the Court ruled that Article 21 of the Constitution did not require Indian courts to apply a due process of law standard. [1] In doing so, the Court upheld the validity of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, with ...
- AIR 1950 SC 27; 1950 SCR 88; (1950) 51 Cri LJ 1383
- A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
- 19 May 1950
- Supreme Court of India
- Introduction
- Background of The Case
- Issues Before The Court
- Judgment
- Legacy
The case of Smt. Champakam Dorairajan v/s state of Madras is a landmark case that was delivered by the Supreme Court of India in 1951.This case along with the case of Romesh Thappar v/s state of Madras, led to the first amendmentof the Indian Constitution.In 1927, Province of Madras had issued a government order known as Communal G.O, with regard to the admission of students to the Engineering & Medical collages of the state.The order stated that the seats in Engineering & Medical Collages should be filled on the following basis: 6 seats for Non-Brahmin Hindus, 2 seats for Backward Hindus, 2 seats for Brahmins, 2 seats...In 1950, Srimati Champakam Dorairajan, a Brahmin candidate, filed an application to High Court of Madras under Article 226 of Indian Constitution, complaining of a breach of her fundamental right t...The High Court of Madras delivered its judgement and ruled in favor of Champakam Dorairajan.The main issue before the court was whether the Communal G.O. of 1927, which provided for reservation in admission to educational institutions based on religion, race and caste, was in violation of...The State of Madras argued that the provisions of these articles have to be read along with other articles in the Constitution, particularly Article 46which charges the State with promoting the edu...The Supreme Court held that the Communal G.O. of 1927 constituted a violation of the fundamental right guaranteed to the citizen of India by Article 29(2) of the Constitution and was therefore void...The Court held that the directive principles of State Policy laid down in Part IV of the Constitution cannot in any way override or abridge the fundamental rights guaranteed by Part III.The Court held that the classification in the said Communal G.O. proceeds on the basis of religion, race and caste and is opposed to the Constitution and constitutes a clear violation of the fundam...The Supreme Court’s judgement in Smt. Champakam Dorairajan v/s State of Madras case held that the Communal G.O. of 1927, which provided for reservation in admission to educational institutions base...The judgement of the Supreme Court led to the first amendment of the Indian Constitution, which added Clause (4) to Article 15, and also brought clarity to the relationship between the directive pr...People also ask
What is Gopalan v State of Madras?
Why was the Supreme Court rejected in Gopalan vs Madras?
What is the significance of state of Madras vs SMT Champakam Dorairajan?
A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in which the Court ruled that Article 21 of the Constitution did not require Indian courts to apply a due process of law standard.[1] In doing so, the Court upheld the validity of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, with the exception of Section 14, which provided that the grounds of ...
Jun 14, 2023 · THIS IS WRITTEN BY: TANYA RAJ, CHANAKYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, INTERN AT LEGAL VIDHIYA. AK GOPALAN V. STATE OF MADRAS, 1950 SCC 228 KEYWORDS: Article 19, Article 22, Article 21, Indian constitution, Supreme Court, Detention INTRODUCTION: A.K. Gopalan V. State of Madras is one of the most important cases in the domain of constitutional right ...
Sep 17, 2020 · INTRODUCTION. State of Madras vs. Smt. Champakam Dorairajan is a landmark case delivered by the Supreme Court of India that, along with Romesh Thappar vs State of Madras (1950), led to the first amendment to the Indian Constitution In 1951. The State of Madras was the petitioner in the case and Smt. Champakam Doralrajan was the respondent.
Apr 22, 2022 · Judgement of A.K. Gopalan vs the State of Madras. The judgment of this case was given by 6 judges constitutional bench of the Supreme Court with the ratio of 5:1 majority. Justice Fazl Ali gave the dissenting opinion. The court rejected the arguments given by A.K. Gopalan and said that personal liberty means freedom of the physical body only ...
Feb 2, 2024 · The legal analysis in State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan delves into the constitutional tapestry woven by the framers of the Constitution. The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Harilal Kania, grapples with the intricate balance between ensuring social justice through affirmative action and upholding the cherished principle of equality.
