Search results
Nov 2, 2020 · In this case also, the Division Bench of this Court followed the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court reported in ( M.K Prasad vs. P. Arumugam) (2001) 6 Supreme Court Cases 176, which was relied on by the learned counsel for the respondents. In Para Nos. 14-A and 15, the Division Bench of this Court held thus:-.
May 10, 2021 · With these directions, these writ petitions are allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Dr. Avinash Poddar. Ahemdabad, India. Madras HC Order in the case of M/s DY Beathel Enterprises Vs. State Tax Officer. Whether the input tax credit availed by the purchaser can be questioned.
The Supreme Court is open to the public Monday through Friday, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., excluding federal holidays. Visitors should be aware that the business of the Court may affect public access to the building and visitor programs. Please check Today at the Court on the homepage for the Court's daily calendar.
Summary. Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only. Mr. Desautel shot and killed an elk in the Arrow Lakes region in British Columbia ...
Sep 8, 2021 · INTRODUCTION. AK Gopalan v State of Madras[1] has been noted as one of the significant judgments handed down by the Supreme Court of India. It is recalled as the first case in which the Indian judiciary delivered a judgment to interpret the fundamental rights of the Constitution under Article 19 and 21. After this judgment, the courts in India ...
Apr 22, 2022 · Judgement of A.K. Gopalan vs the State of Madras. The judgment of this case was given by 6 judges constitutional bench of the Supreme Court with the ratio of 5:1 majority. Justice Fazl Ali gave the dissenting opinion. The court rejected the arguments given by A.K. Gopalan and said that personal liberty means freedom of the physical body only ...
Madras High Court M. Siva Perumal vs S.Kamalanathan on 28 April, 2021 Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2021 MAD 2219 Author: R. Subbiah Bench: R. Subbiah, C. Saravanan Crl.M.P.SR No.63240 of 2019 in Crl.A.No.373 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Order Reserved on : 04.03.2021 Order Pronounced on : 28-04-2021 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.
