Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v Canada (Minister of Justice) [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1120, 2000 SCC 69 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on freedom of expression and equality rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It was held that the Customs Act, which gave broad powers to customs inspectors to exclude "obscene ...
Corbiere v Canada (Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs) [1999] 2 S.C.R. 203, is a leading case from the Supreme Court of Canada where the Court expanded the scope of applicable grounds upon which a section 15(1) Charter claim can be based. This was also the first case to use the framework proposed by Law v. Canada.
Aug 18, 2017 · The Delgamuukw case (1997) (also known as Delgamuukw v. British Columbia) concerned the definition, the content and the extent of Aboriginal title (i.e., ownership of traditional lands). The Supreme Court of Canada observed that Aboriginal title constituted an ancestral right protected by section 35 (1) of the Constitution Act, 1982.
Mar 17, 1994 · Freedom of conscience and religion - Scope of right - The Supreme Court of Canada per La Forest, J. (Gonthier, McLachlin, Sopinka and L'Heureux-Dubé, JJ., concurring), discussed whether the right of freedom of religion (Charter, s. 2(a)) was intrinsically limited and held that rather than impose internal restrictions, limitations of this ...
The court remanded Ponnaiah to judicial custody for 15 days, and the Madras High Court granted conditional bail on August 10. Freedom of Expression for Members of the Press and Other Media, Including Online Media: Independent media were active and generally expressed a wide variety of views.
Cases in Brief. Cases in Brief are short summaries of the Court’s written decisions drafted in reader-friendly language, so that anyone interested can learn about the decisions that affect their lives. They are prepared by communications staff of the Supreme Court of Canada. They do not form part of the Court’s reasons for judgment and are ...
Mar 14, 2023 · Case: J. MOHAMMED NAZIR & ANR. VERSUS MAHASEMAM TRUST & ORS. The Supreme Court has ordered the Madras High Court to take the appropriate corrective action in a peculiar matter where it was discovered that the decision that was first pronounced and the order that was uploaded to the Madras High Court website were different.
Yahoo Web Search
About 37,200,000 search results
