Search results
Apr 21, 2021 · Decision. Durairaj v. The Sub Registrar. (The case has been heard through video conference) This writ petition has been filed challenging the Check Slip issued by the respondent thereby refusing to register the sale deeds on the ground that a civil suit is pending between the parties. 2.
Nov 4, 2020 · Observations of the Court: The Board has, in my view, extended a waiver of recovery for the past period in line with the decisions of the Council (vi) Notification dated 18.09.2020, which cemented the long line of assurances of the GST Council and the Board in letter and spirit. While promising that the amendment in question will be clarified ...
September 29, 2005. The Supreme Court of the United States ( SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that turn on questions of U.S. constitutional or federal law. It also has original jurisdiction over a ...
Aug 28, 2023 · The Court said that the Madras High Court's view was a narrow one based on the assumption that self-respect marriage needed public declaration. Upholding the fundamental right of a person to ...
Sep 25, 2014 · “reportable” in the supreme court of india civil original/appellate jurisdiction transferred case (c) no. 150 of 2006 madras bar association …petitioner(s) versus union of india and another …respondents with civil appeal no. 3850 of 2006 civil appeal no. 3862 of 2006 civil appeal no. 3881 of 2006 civil appeal no. 3882 of 2006 civil ...
May 6, 2015 · The diving line is difficult to find; but in the case of a company with its professed objects and the manner of its activities and the nature of its dealings with its property, it is possible to say on which side the operations fall and to what head the income is to be assigned (Karanpura Development Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, West ...
Dec 17, 2018 · Lastly, the learned counsel would rely on the decision rendered by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Crl.R.C.No.268 of 1981 dated 10.08.1981, in the case of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., vs. State and another, wherein, the learned Judge has held that orders passed under Section 451 of Cr.P.C. is not an interlocutory order.
