Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. 3 days ago · Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that held the U.S. Constitution did not extend American citizenship to people of black African descent, and therefore they could not enjoy the rights and privileges the Constitution conferred upon American citizens.

    • Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford
    • Judgment for defendant, C.C.D. Mo.
    • Taney, joined by Wayne, Catron, Daniel, Nelson, Grier, Campbell
  2. 4 days ago · To search for cases on a topic there are several tools to use. BriefCase is a comprehensive index of more than 180 000 cases sourced from a variety of courts and tribunals. Each entry will provide a cases summary, legislation cited, cases cited and classification terms.

    • Catherine Doughty
    • 2019
  3. People also ask

  4. 3 days ago · Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), [1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality. The decision partially overruled the Court's 1896 decision Plessy v.

    • Warren, joined by unanimous
    • Oliver Brown, et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka, et al.
  5. 4 days ago · A treaty is an agreement between sovereign States (countries) and in some cases international organisations, which is binding at international law. An agreement between an Australian State or Territory and a foreign Government will not, therefore, be a treaty.

    • Trung Quach
    • 2020
  6. 5 days ago · Per Duke International Legal Research Tutorial:. Included in the list of sources of international law in Article 38 of the International Court of Justice Statute are “general principles of law recognized by civilized nations” (i.e. general principles of fairness and justice which are applied universally in legal systems around the world).

  7. 4 days ago · Examples of Tort Law A Liability Case . In February 2016, a self-driving car made by Google crashed into a bus in Mountain View, Calif.

  8. 4 days ago · Last week’s Supreme Court argument concerning Trump’s January 6 prosecution considered both his claim of “absolute immunity” from prosecution for acts within the “outer perimeter” of his official responsibility and a supposed “plain statement rule” that could allow a president to get away with serious crimes. This supposed rule ...

  1. People also search for