Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. In 1928 he applied for a German patent on aircraft powered by supersonic ramjets, and this was awarded in 1932. [5] [6] [7] The first patent for using a gas turbine to power an aircraft was filed in 1921 by Frenchman Maxime Guillaume. [8] His engine was an axial-flow turbojet .

  2. The Junkers Jumo 004 was the first axial-flow turbojet. On March 15, 1942, a Junkers Jumo 004 prototype was tested on a Messerschmitt Bf 110 making it the world’s first successful axial-flow turbojet engine. It would be the first jet engine to go into volume production and would power the world’s first operation jet fighter, the ...

  3. People also ask

  4. The Junkers Jumo 004 was the world's first production turbojet engine in operational use, and the first successful axial compressor turbojet engine. Some 8,000 units were manufactured by Junkers in Germany late in World War II , powering the Messerschmitt Me 262 fighter and the Arado Ar 234 reconnaissance/bomber, along with prototypes ...

  5. Adjustment of the angle of the engines’ nozzles allowed the aircraft to take off and land without a runway—the vertical/short-takeoff-and-landing (V/STOL) concept. For the American market, the Harrier was licensed by McDonnell Douglas and produced for the U.S. Marines.

  6. Feb 24, 2024 · The Me 262 was initially designed at the request of Nazi Germany's leader, Adolph Hitler, who wanted a wonder weapon that could bomb the Allies. The idea was to attach to the Me 262 jet engines that Ernst Heinkel and Bayerische Motor Werke (BMW) started working on in the early 1930s.

    • Joe Kunzler
    • Journalist
  7. Feb 4, 2023 · The jet did not allow Germany to regain air superiority, but jet engines optimized for production enabled the regime to produce aero-engines as efficiently as possible with its remaining resources. Great Britain also deployed jet aircraft in mid-1944, but its government de-emphasized short-term engine production in favour of a broad development ...

  8. Germany was “the third country to decide to produce jet engines”, and did so because of the “failure to develop new, faster piston-engined aircraft”, which left the jet engine as the answer to matching the superior Allied piston engines. This was the military logic for moving to jet engines, but Giffard also makes a strong case for the

  1. People also search for