Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice William O. Douglas, the Court found that the Fifth Amendment does not limit Congress’ power to seize private property with just compensation to any specific purpose. The Court concluded that the power to determine what values to consider in seizing property for public welfare is Congress’ alone.

  2. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language. Get Nebraska v. Parker, 136 S. Ct. 1072 (2016), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.

  3. Dec 3, 2013 · Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. case brief summary 474 P.2d 689 (1970) CASE SYNOPSIS. ... Likewise, if you have case briefs you would like to share, ...

  4. Apr 7, 2017 · The Court referenced precedent set out in Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954), and Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229 (1984), where a state’s use of eminent domain was upheld when land was taken from private individuals and sold to other private individuals. This was because the purpose of the eminent domain projects were held ...

  5. Get Stark v. Parker, 19 Mass. (2 Pick.) 267 (1824), Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.

  6. Mar 13, 2017 · Ohio. Following is the case brief for Terry v. Ohio, Supreme Court of the United States, (1968) Case Summary of Terry v. Ohio. Three men, including Terry ( defendant ), were approached by an officer who had observed their alleged suspicious behavior. The officer suspected the men were planning to rob the store.

  7. Mr Clark wrote to Mr Parker stating the Clarks would bequeath their home to Mrs Parker, her sister and her daughter on their death. The Parkers sold their home and moved in with the Clarks. The Clarks told the Parkers the arrangement was not working, and they would have to move out. The Parkers brought an action for breach of contract.