Search results
Quick answer: Anti-federalists opposed the Constitution, fearing it granted excessive power to the federal government and undermined states' rights, principles they...
The Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of individual liberties, an erosion of state sovereignty, and the potential for the rise of tyranny. They advocated for a more decentralized form of government with greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states.
- 1789; 234 years ago
- Patrick Henry
- 1787; 236 years ago
- Patriots
People also ask
Why did anti-federalists oppose the Constitution?
Why did the Anti-federalists oppose the new plan of government?
Why did the Anti-Federalists reject the Constitutional Convention?
How did Anti-Federalist influence the Constitution?
May 11, 2018 · The most problematic omission in the Constitution, especially in the view of moderate anti-Federalists, was the lack of a bill of rights. Not protecting freedom of the press or due process rights for the criminally accused made many anti-Federalists suspicious of Federalist motives.
Apr 23, 2024 · Though those who opposed the Constitution actually wanted a more purely federal system (as the Articles provided), they were more or less forced into taking the name “Anti-Federalists.” These men had many reasons to oppose the Constitution. They did not feel that a republican form of government could work on a national scale.
Expert Answers. Michael Koren. | Certified Educator. Share Cite. The Anti-Federalists had several reasons for opposing the creation of a strong federal government. The Anti-Federalists...
Aug 8, 2019 · August 08, 2019. In early August 1787, the Constitutional Convention’s Committee of Detail had just presented its preliminary draft of the Constitution to the rest of the delegates, and the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were beginning to parse some of the biggest foundational debates over what American government should look like.
“Anti-Federalist” describes the philosophical and political position of individuals who, during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and the subsequent state ratification debates (1787–89), generally opposed the constitution proposed to replace the Articles of Confederation.
