Search results
- Justice Neil Gorsuch threw out several hypotheticals — a sit-in that disrupted a trial, heckling that interrupted the State of the Union, or pulling a fire alarm that delayed a congressional vote — that suggested he was skeptical of the government’s broad reading of the statute, which carries a maximum imprisonment of 20 years.
People also ask
Why did Gorsuch threw out a sit-in?
What was Justice Gorsuch's opinion?
Does Gorsuch want a Supreme Court statute to be interpreted?
Why did the Supreme Court support Gorsuch & Sotomayor?
Apr 16, 2024 · Justice Neil Gorsuch threw out several hypotheticals — a sit-in that disrupted a trial, heckling that interrupted the State of the Union, or pulling a fire alarm that delayed a...
Apr 7, 2017 · Politics Apr 7, 2017 1:03 PM EDT. It’s over. The Senate has confirmed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court on a largely party-line 54-45 vote, ending a months-long process marked by partisanship ...
Jun 12, 2017 · on Jun 12, 2017 at 3:15 pm. There was much speculation that Justice Neil Gorsuch would be assigned at least one opinion from the 13 cases of the court’s April sitting, which began one week after he took his oaths to join the court on April 10. The court takes the bench this morning, with Justices Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito absent, and we ...
Jun 23, 2020 · First, Justice Gorsuch set out to determine the “ordinary public meaning” of the statute’s text at the time of its enactment in 1964. After parsing through the language, Justice Gorsuch acknowledged that the statute provided a “straightforward rule,” that “[a]n employer violates Title VII when it intentionally fires an employee ...
Mar 17, 2017 · on Mar 17, 2017 at 11:26 am. Not too long before he was nominated to fill Justice Antonin Scalia’s seat on the Supreme Court, Judge Neil Gorsuch published two opinions – in the same case – staking out some genuinely heterodox positions on administrative law.
Dec 20, 2023 · In the decision, the Colorado Supreme Court’s slim majority saw fit to reference then-appellate judge Gorsuch’s opinion in Hassan v.Colorado, a case of a naturalized citizen who was constitutionally barred from being on the ballot for the presidency despite Hassan’s claims that such a prohibition ran afoul of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause.
Mar 17, 2017 · This kind of “trespassing” would have been a “search” when the Fourth Amendment was first adopted in the 18th century, and so it is still a “search” today. Judge Neil Gorsuch, the president’s nominee to succeed Scalia on the court, also describes himself as an originalist. And he too has adhered to originalist principles in ...
