Search results
The United States Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. The text of the First Amendment states that: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to ...
- Wikipedia Is Not A Paper Encyclopedia
- Wikipedia Is Not A Dictionary
- Wikipedia Is Not A Publisher of Original Thought
- Wikipedia Is Not A Soapbox Or Means of Promotion
- Wikipedia Is Not A Mirror Or A Repository of Links, Images, Or Media Files
- Wikipedia Is Not A Directory
- Wikipedia Is Not A Manual, Guidebook, Textbook, Or Scientific Journal
- Wikipedia Is Not A Crystal Ball
- Wikipedia Is Not A Newspaper
- Wikipedia Is Not An Indiscriminate Collection of Information
Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, but a digital encyclopedia project. Other than verifiabilityand the other points presented on this page, there is no practical limit to the number of topics Wikipedia can cover, or the total amount of content. However, there is an important distinction between what can be done, and what should be done, which i...
Wikipedia is not a dictionary, or a usage or jargon guide. For a wiki that is a dictionary, visit our sister project Wiktionary. Missing dictionary definitions should be transwikiedthere. Wikipedia articles are not: 1. Definitions. Articles should begin with a good definition or description, but articles that contain nothing more than a definition ...
Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses or to publish new information. Per our policy on original research, please do not use Wikipedia for any of the following: 1. Primary (original) research, such as proposing theories and solutions, communicating original ideas, offering novel definitions of terms, coining new words, e...
Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. This applies to usernames, articles, drafts, categories, files, talk page discussions, templates, and user pages. Therefore, content hosted on Wikipedia is not for: 1. Shortcut 1.1. WP:NOTADVOCACYAdvocacy, propaganda, or recruitment of any kind: com...
Wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of links, images, or media files.Wikipedia articles are not merely collections of: 1. External links or Internet directories. There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract...
Wikipedia encompasses many lists of links to articles within Wikipedia that are used for internal organization or to describe a notable subject. In that sense, Wikipedia functions as an index or directory of its own content. However, Wikipedia is not a directory of everything in the universe that exists or has existed. Please see Wikipedia:Alternat...
Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not an instruction manual, guidebook, or textbook. Wikipedia articles should not read like: 1. Instruction manuals and cookbooks: While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places and things, an article should not read like a "how-to" style owner's manual, cookbook, advice column (legal, medical or otherwise...
Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation, rumors, or presumptions. Wikipedia does not predict the future. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It is appropriate to report discussion and...
Editors are encouraged to include current and up-to-date information within its coverage, and to develop stand-alone articles on significant current events. However, not all verifiable events are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Ensure that Wikipedia articles are not: 1. Original reporting. Wikipedia should not offer first-hand news reports on ...
To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources. As explained in § Encyclopedic content above, merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Wikipedia articles should not be: 1. Shortcut 1.1. WP:NOTPLOTSummary-...
People also ask
Is Wikipedia an unregulated forum for free speech?
Why is free speech so important?
Where did free speech come from?
Is free speech a good idea?
Mar 20, 2023 · Wikipedia, which launched in 2001 is a free online encyclopedia run by the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation and written collaboratively by its users. There are 10 rules and five pillars for ...
The "right to free speech " has been cited on Wikipedia in response to sanctions against editors such as blocks and bans, as well as speedy deletions and editing restrictions imposed by administrators or the Arbitration Committee. Although the Wikimedia Foundation is headquartered (and some Wikipedia servers are located) in the United States ...
Sep 11, 2016 · The term “free speech” is not ideal. The “free” part skews in favour of those who oppose regulation and the “speech” part puts the focus on the spoken word, even though the discussion ...
- David Van Mill
He argued that free speech does not depend on the color of your skin or the size of your wallet, and that the right of free speech is a very precious one, especially to the oppressed. I would say ...
Free Speech. The online world offers the promise of speech with minimal barriers and without borders. New technologies and widespread internet access have radically enhanced our ability to express ourselves; criticize those in power; gather and report the news; and make, adapt, and share creative works. Vulnerable communities have also found ...
