Search results
Jan 1, 2015 · By Adam Chitwood. Published Jan 1, 2015. Director Sam Raimi talks about the failure of Spider-Man 3 and explains why the film turned out to be "awful", saying he didn't believe in the...
- Adam Chitwood
- Spider-Man 3 Had Too Many Villains
- This Is Venom?!
- Peter Parker Goes Emo
- Mary Jane Watson
- Trying to Raise The Stakes
Raimi's first two Spider-Man movies benefited hugely from orbiting around one single villain - Willem Dafoe's Green Goblin in the first and Alfred Molina's Doctor Octopus in the sequel. This approach ensured both Spidey stories had a laser-sharp focus, and afforded both baddies ample time to develop into well-rounded villains, rather than generic, ...
There was a palpable excitement when Venom was revealed as one of Spider-Man3's villains, and a just-as-palpable deflated groan when audiences finally saw the iconic comic character in live-action. In fairness, taking a crazed symbiote from the comic books and translating that fantastical alien for the big screen was no easy task, but Spider-Man3's...
Spider-Man 3's woes can largely be surmised by one infamous scene, but that's just the tip of a floppy-haired, black eyeliner-ed iceberg. While under the influence of the Venom symbiote, Peter Parker is supposed to lean into his darker instincts, but Spider-Man's interpretation of said darkness wasn't anywhere close to what audiences were expecting...
If there's one thing the Andrew Garfield era of Spider-Man movies did better than the original trilogy, it was female leads, with Emma Stone's Gwen Stacy by far the more rounded and interesting character. By contrast, Kirsten Dunst's Mary Jane never strays far from the archetype of a comic book love interest throughout her first 2 Spider-Man movies...
Admirably, Sam Raimi has held his hands up in acknowledgement of Spider-Man 3's failure and publicly admitted the film was the worst of the trilogy. Among the problems the director himself cites are the inclusion of Venom, who Raimi freely concedes was not a character he loved, and trying too hard to outdo the previous movies by 'going big' instead...
- Junior Lead Features Editor
Box office. $896 million [7] Spider-Man 3 is a 2007 American superhero film based on the Marvel Comics character Spider-Man. Produced by Columbia Pictures, Marvel Studios, and Laura Ziskin Productions, and distributed by Sony Pictures Releasing, it was directed by Sam Raimi from a screenplay he co-wrote with his brother Ivan and Alvin Sargent ...
- $895 million
- $258–350 million
People also ask
Is Spider-Man 3 based on a true story?
Was 'Spider-Man 3' a good movie?
What's wrong with Spider-Man 3?
Will 'Spider-Man 3' be overwhelming?
Apr 25, 2024 · Although Spider-Man 3 is a movie about a wall-crawling super-genius fighting a villain made of sand, fans believe its physics should still be logical. The first fight scene between the new Goblin and Spider-Man is widely considered the worst offender of the film's implausible physics .
Jan 3, 2015 · Your opinion on this film clashes with that of the majority. The film was a trainwreck, compared with th first two or not. I’ve gone and watched all 5 of the Spiderman films over the last few days.
May 9, 2022 · Ovidiu Hrubaru/Shutterstock. In his career as an actor, Thomas Haden Church has gone anywhere and everywhere. One minute he's the goofy adversary of Brendan Fraser's "George of the Jungle," the ...
Apr 22, 2024 · For the longest time, she was just a tragic memory. Spider-Man 3 bucked this trend by keeping her alive as MJ's romantic competition and Peter's greatest temptation. Unfortunately, the movie also pulled its punches by making Peter and Gwen's fling be influenced by the Symbiote.
