Yahoo Web Search

  1. Wikipedia - Wikipedia › wiki › Wikipedia

    The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer—a 1976 album from the German rock band Scorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries.

  2. Wikipedia:Requested articles - Wikipedia › wiki › Wikipedia:Requested_articles

    How to request an article. 1. First, check that the article you're looking for doesn't already exist: Search Wikipedia (or use a search engine) for existing articles. If an article exists, but not at the title you expected, you can create a redirect. Check your spelling.

  3. People also ask

    What do you need to know about Wikipedia article titles?

    How many hits does a featured article get on Wikipedia?

    Is there an article that already exists on Wikipedia?

    How to request an article to be added to Wikipedia?

  4. Wikipedia:Today's featured article - Wikipedia › wiki › Wikipedia:Today&

    Each day, a summary (roughly 975 characters long) of one of Wikipedia's featured articles (FAs) appears at the top of the Main Page as Today's Featured Article (TFA). The Main Page typically gets around 15 million hits per day.

  5. Help:Your first article - Wikipedia › wiki › Wikipedia:Your_first_article
    • The Basics
    • Search For An Existing Article
    • Gathering References
    • Things to Avoid
    • and Be Careful about...
    • Are You Closely Connected to The Article topic?
    • Still Need Help?

    First, please be aware that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia written by volunteers. Our mission is to share reliable knowledge to benefit people who want to learn. We are not social media, a place to promote a company or product or person, to advocate for or against anyone or anything, nor a place to first announce to the world information on topics that have not already been the subject of reliable publication. Please keep this in mind, always. (This is described in "What Wikipedia is not".) We find "accepted knowledge" in high quality, published sources. By "high quality" we mean books by reputable publishers, respected newspapers, peer reviewed scientific and academic journals, literature reviews and other sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means generally not using random personal websites, blogs, forum posts, Facebook, LinkedIn or Twitter content, self-published sources like open wikis (including other Wikipedia articles), etc. We summarizesuch high qual...

    The English Wikipedia already has 6,296,135 articles. Before creating an article, try to make sure there is not already an article on the same topic, perhaps under a slightly different name. Search for the article, and review Wikipedia's article titling policy before creating your first article. If an article on your topic already exists, but you think people might look for it under some different name or spelling, learn how to create redirects to alternative titles; adding needed redirects is a good way to help Wikipedia. If you're not already autoconfirmed, you can request a redirect to be created at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories, where a volunteer will review the request, and if it seems like a plausible search term, accept the redirect request. Also, remember to check the article's deletion login order to avoid creating an article that has already been deleted. (In some cases, the topic may be suitable even if deleted in the past; the past deletion may...

    Gather sources for the information you will be writing about. You will use references to establish notability and to cite particular facts. References used to support notability must meet additional criteria beyond reliability. References used for specific facts need not meet these additional criteria. To be worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia, a subject must be sufficiently notable, and that notability must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources. As noted, the sources you use must be reliable; that is, they must be sources that exercise some form of editorial control and have some reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Print sources (and web-based versions of those sources) tend to be the most reliable, though some web-only sources may also be reliable. Examples might include (but are not limited to) books published by major publishing houses, newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed scholarly journals, websites of any of the above, and other websites that meet the...

    Articles about yourself, your family or friends, your website, a band you're in, your teacher, a word you made up, or a story you wrote

    1. If you or someone or something you are personally involved with is worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia, let someone else add that article. Putting your friends in an encyclopedia may seem like a nice surprise or an amusing joke, but those articles are likely to be removed. In this process, feelings may be hurt and you may be blocked from editing if you repeatedly make attempts to re-create the article. These things can be avoided by a little forethought on your part. The article may re...


    1. Please do not try to promote your product or business. Please do not post external links to your commercial website. We do have articles about products such as Kleenex and Sharpies and about notable businesses such as McDonald's, but if you are writing about a product or business, be sure you write from a neutral point of view, that you have no conflict of interest, and that you are able to find references in reliable sources that are independent from the subject you are writing about. For...

    Attacks on a person or organization

    1. Material that violates our biographies of living persons policy or is intended to threaten, defame, or harass its subject or another entity is not permitted. Unsourced negative information, especially in articles about living people, is quickly removed, and attack pagesmay be deleted immediately.

    Copying things. Do not violate copyrights!

    1. Never copy-paste text into a Wikipedia article unless it is a relatively short quotation, placed in quotation marks, and cited using an inline citation. Even material that you are sure is in the public domain must be attributed to the source, or the result, while not a copyright violation, is plagiarism. Also, note that most web pages are not in the public domain and that most song lyrics are not, either. In fact, most things published after 1926 and almost all works written since January...

    Good research and citing your sources

    1. Articles written out of thin air may be better than nothing, but they are hard to verify, which is an important part of building a trusted reference work. Please research with the best sources available and cite them properly. Doing this, along with not copying text, will help avoid any possibility of plagiarism. We welcome good short articles, called "stubs", that can serve as launching pads from which others can take off – stubs can be relatively short, a few sentences, but should provid...

    Articles or statements about living persons

    1. As with all topics, articles written about living persons must be referenced so that they can be verified. This requirement is enforced far more rigorously for any statements about a living (or recently deceased) person, and reviewers are supposed to immediately remove any unreferenced material without discussion. It is good practice to add your references as you write the article to avoid this immediate removal.

    Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, but there are special guidelines for editors who are paid or sponsored. These guidelines are intended to prevent biased articles and maintain the public's trust that content in Wikipedia is impartial and has been added in good faith. (See Wikipedia's conflict of interest (COI)guideline.) The official guidelines are that editors must be volunteers. That means Wikipedia discourages editing articles about individuals, companies, organizations, products/services, or political causes that pay you directly or indirectly. This includes in-house PR departments and marketing departments, other company employees, public relations firms and publicists, social-media consultants, and online reputation managementconsultants. However, Wikipedia recognizes the large volume of good-faith contributions by people who have some affiliation to the articles they work on. Here are some ground rules. Note that this is not necessarily a full list, so use c...

    For a list of informative, instructional and supportive pages, see Help directory.
    The best places to ask for assistance are at the Teahouse and at the main Help desk.
    For a list of the services and assistance that can be requested on Wikipedia, see Request departments.
  6. Wikipedia:Good articles - Wikipedia › wiki › Wikipedia:Good_articles

    Good articles in Wikipedia. A good article (GA) is an article that meets a core set of editorial standards, the good article criteria, passing through the good article nomination process successfully. They are well written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view, stable, and ...

  7. 4 Ways to Write a Wikipedia Article - wikiHow › Write-a-Wikipedia-Article
    • 570.5K
    • Begin. Go to Wikipedia's Main Page or, if you want to write your article in a language other than English, visit the international page and click on your language.
    • Search. First, you'll need to do a search to see if the article already exists - if yours is a popular or well-known subject, the chances are it already exists.
    • Results. If an article about your subject already exists, the article will come up now; if no such article exists, you will get a list of search results.
    • Think. If no article exists and you wish to create an article, first ask yourself the following questions: Is it a worthwhile subject for an encyclopedia article?Is it notable (will anyone else ever bother to read this)?Is it verifiable (are there other references to it elsewhere on the internet, or in books)?If the answer is 'no' to any of these, do not create the article.
  8. Wikipedia:Article titles - Wikipedia › wiki › Wikipedia:Article_titles
    • Deciding on An Article Title
    • Use Commonly Recognizable Names
    • Neutrality in Article Titles
    • Explicit Conventions
    • Precision and Disambiguation
    • English-Language Titles
    • Treatment of Alternative Names
    • Article Title Format
    • Titles containing "And"
    • Considering Changes

    Article titles are based on how reliable English-language sources refer to the article's subject. There is often more than one appropriate title for an article. In that case, editors choose the best title by consensusbased on the considerations that this page explains. A good Wikipedia article title has the five following characteristics: 1. Recognizability– The title is a name or description of the subject that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize. 2. Naturalness– The title is one that readers are likely to look or search for and that editors would naturally use to link to the article from other articles. Such a title usually conveys what the subject is actually called in English. 3. Precision – The title unambiguously identifies the article's subject and distinguishes it from other subjects. (See § Precision and disambiguation, below.) 4. Conciseness – The title is no longer than necessary to identify the article's subject a...

    In Wikipedia, an article title is a natural-language word or expression that indicates the subject of the article; as such, the article title is usually the name of the person, or of the place, or of whatever else the topic of the article is. However, some topics have multiple names, and some names have multiple topics; this can lead to disagreement about which name should be used for a given article's title. Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources) as such names will usually best fit the five criteria listed above.When there is no single, obvious name that is demonstrably the most frequently used for the topic by these sources, editors should reach a consensus as to which title is best by considering these criteria directly. For cases where usage differs among English-speak...

    Conflicts often arise over whether an article title complies with Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy. Resolving such debates depends on whether the article title is a name derived from reliable sources or a descriptive titlecreated by Wikipedia editors.

    Wikipedia has many naming conventions relating to specific subject domains (as listed in the box at the top of this page). In rare cases these recommend the use of titles that are not strictly the common name (as in the case of the conventions for medicine). This practice of using specialized names is often controversial, and should not be adopted unless it produces clear benefits outweighing the use of common names; when it is, the article titles adopted should follow a neutral and common convention specific to that subject domain, and otherwise adhere to the general principles for titling articles on Wikipedia.


    Usually, titles should unambiguously define the topical scope of the article, but should be no more precise than that. For instance, Saint Teresa of Calcutta is too precise, as Mother Teresa is precise enough to indicate exactly the same topic. On the other hand, Horowitz would not be precise enough to identify unambiguously the famous classical pianist Vladimir Horowitz. Exceptions to the precision criterion may sometimes result from the application of some other naming criteria. Most of the...


    It is not always possible to use the exact title that may be desired for an article, as that title may have other meanings, and therefore may have been already used for other articles. According to the above-mentioned precision criterion, when a more detailed title is necessary to distinguish an article topic from another, use only as much additional detail as necessary. For example, it would be redundant to title an article "Queen (rock band)", as Queen (band) is precise enough to distinguis...

    When a spelling variant indicates a distinct topic

    Ambiguity may arise when typographically near-identical expressions have distinct meanings, e.g. Iron maiden vs. Iron Maiden, or Ice cube vs. Ice Cube. The general approach is that whatever readers might type in the search box, they are guided as swiftly as possible to the topic they might reasonably be expected to be looking for, by such disambiguation techniques as hatnotes and/or disambiguation pages. When such navigation aids are in place, small details are usually sufficient to distingui...

    On the English Wikipedia, article titles are written using the English language. However, it must be remembered that the English language contains many loan words and phrases taken from other languages. If a word or phrase (originally taken from some other language) is commonly used by English-language sources, it can be considered to be an English-language word or phrase (example: coup d'état). The English-language names of some topics may differ according to how names are anglicized from other languages, or according to different varieties of English (e.g. American English, British English, Australian English, etc.).

    By the design of Wikipedia's software, an article can only have one title. When this title is a name, significant alternative names for the topic should be mentioned in the article, usually in the first sentence or paragraph. If there are three or more alternative names – including alternative spellings, longer or shorter forms, historic names, and significant names in other languages – or there is something notable about the names themselves, a separate name section is recommended. Alternative names may be used in article text when context dictates that they are more appropriate than the name used as the title of the article. For example, the city now called Gdańsk is referred to as Danzig in historic contexts to which that name is more suited (e.g. when it was part of Germany or a Free City). Likewise, even though Color's title omits the "u", Orange (colour)'s title does not. All significant alternative titles, names, or forms of names that apply to a specific article should usual...

    The following points are used in deciding on questions not covered by the five principles; consistency on these helps avoid duplicate articles: Use sentence case 1. Titles are written in sentence case. The initial letter of a title is almost always capitalized by default; otherwise, words are not capitalized unless they would be so in running text. When this is done, the title is simple to link to in other articles: Northwestern University offers more graduate work than a typical liberal arts college. Note that the capitalization of the initial letter is ignored in links. For initial lowercase letters, as in eBay, see the technical restrictions page. For more guidance, see WP:Naming conventions (capitalization) and WP:Manual of Style/Proper names. Use the singular form 1. Article titles are generally singular in form, e.g. Horse, not Horses. Exceptions include nouns that are always in a plural form in English (e.g. scissors or trousers) and the names of classes of objects (e.g. Arab...

    Sometimes two or more closely related or complementary concepts are most sensibly covered by a single article. Where possible, use a title covering all cases: for example, Endianness covers the concepts "big-endian" and "little-endian". Where no reasonable overarching title is available, it is permissible to construct an article title using "and", as in Promotion and relegation, Hellmann's and Best Foods, and Pioneer 6, 7, 8, and 9. (The individual terms – such as Pioneer 6– should redirect to the combined page, or be linked there via a disambiguation page or hatnote if they have other meanings.) It is generally best to list topics in alphabetical order, especially those involving different countries or cultures, as in Canada–United States border. However, when an alphabetical ordering does not make much sense, a more logical or conventional ordering should be followed instead, such as at yin and yang (Google ngram). If one concept is more commonly encountered than the other, it may...

    Changing one controversial title to another without a discussion that leads to consensus is strongly discouraged. If an article title has been stable for a long time, and there is no good reason to change it, it should not be changed. Consensus among editors determines if there does exist a good reason to change the title. If it has never been stable, or it has been unstable for a long time, and no consensus can be reached on what the title should be, default to the title used by the first major contributor after the article ceased to be a stub. Any potentially controversial proposal to change a title should be advertised at Wikipedia:Requested moves, and consensus reached before any change is made. Debating controversial titles is often unproductive, and there are many other ways to help improve Wikipedia. In discussing the appropriate title of an article, remember that the choice of title is not dependent on whether a name is "right" in a moral or political sense. Nor does the use...

  9. Article (grammar) - Simple English Wikipedia, the free ... › wiki › Article_(grammar)

    An article is a word that comes before a noun. There are two kinds of articles: definite articles and indefinite articles . In English there is just one definite article: "the". There are two indefinite articles: "a" and "an". The word "an" is used before a word starting with a vowel sound (not necessarily a vowel letter): we say "a horse", "a child", "a European" (European has a "Y" sound, /j/, which is a consonant sound), "a university", but "an orange", "an elephant".

  10. Wikipedia Co-Founder: Site's Neutrality Is 'Dead' Thanks to ... › tech › 2020/05/26

    May 26, 2020 · Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia, published a blog post earlier this month declaring the online encyclopedia’s “neutral point of view” policy was “dead” due to the rampant left-wing bias of the site’s articles. Noting the article on President Trump, Sanger contrasted its extensive coverage of presidential scandals with the largely scandal-free article on former President Obama.

  11. People also search for