Search results
Get California & Hawaiian Sugar Co. v. Sun Ship, Inc., 794 F.2d 1433 (1986), United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before NELSON, CANBY and JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges. NOONAN, Circuit Judge. Jurisdiction in this case is based on the diversity of citizenship of California and Hawaiian Sugar company (C and H), a California corporation; Sun Ship, Inc. (Sun), a ...
The motion for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected. Judge Nelson dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing. The motion for leave to file a supplement to the petition for rehearing is denied. Read California and Hawaiian Sugar Co. v. Sun Ship, 811 F.2d 1264, see flags on bad law, and search ...
This agreement was entitled "Contract for the Construction of One Oceangoing Barge for California and Hawaiian Sugar Company By Sun Ship, Inc." The "Whereas" clause of the contract identified C and H as the Purchaser, and Sun as the Contractor; it identified "one non-self-propelled oceangoing barge" as the Vessel that Purchaser was buying from ...
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 811 F.2d 1264 (9th Cir. 1987) March 3, 1987
California & Hawaiian Sugar Co. v. Sun Ship, Inc. Case Brief Summary: A company was supposed to build a boat to carry sugar, but they didn't do it on time. The sugar company sued, and the court said the boat company had to pay them a lot of money.
ICRA Issue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for California & Hawaiian Sugar Co. v. Sun Ship, Inc. Issue: The issue is: whether it was lawful and appropriate to amend the original case filing, and if the decision to deny the full court rehearing and the supplementary filing was justified. Conclusion: The legal conclusion of the court is that there is ...
