Yahoo Web Search

  1. Brienza v. Tepper (1995) :: :: California Court of Appeal ...

    law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/...

    On January 29, 1993, Tepper filed a motion to offset his Colorado judgment against Brienza's judgment in the instant action. fn. 3 In connection with the offset motion, Tepper requested the court order: (1) Brienza's judgment against Tepper has been satisfied; (2) Tepper's judgment against Brienza has been partially satisfied and $41,090.03 of ...

  2. BRIENZA v. TEPPER | 35 Cal.App.4th 1839 (1995) | th183911793 ...

    www.leagle.com/decision/1995187435calapp4th183911793

    On April 4, 1990, Brienza filed the underlying lawsuit against Tepper. The complaint alleged various causes of action arising out of a breach by Tepper of an alleged oral partnership agreement. On January 24, 1991, Brienza retained Attorney Gino V. Mazzanti (Mazzanti) under a contingency fee agreement.

  3. BRIENZA v. TEPPER | FindLaw

    caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1759716.html

    On January 29, 1993, Tepper filed a motion to offset his Colorado judgment against Brienza's judgment in the instant action. 3 In connection with the offset motion, Tepper requested the court order: (1) Brienza's judgment against Tepper has been satisfied; (2) Tepper's judgment against Brienza has been partially satisfied and $41,090.03 of the ...

  4. Brienza v. Tepper, 42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 690 ... - courtlistener.com

    www.courtlistener.com/.../2257070/brienza-v-tepper

    Opinion for Brienza v. Tepper, 42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 690, 35 Cal. App. 4th 1839 β€” Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

  5. BRIENZA v. TEPPER | Cal. Ct. App. | Judgment | Law | CaseMine

    www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914bd5eadd7b...

    COUNSEL Frank, Ayers Larsen, Robert D. Frank and Katherine A. Yesson for Defendants and Appellants. Givens Mazzanti and Gino V. Mazzanti for Plaintiff and Respondent.

  6. Pou Chen Corporation v. Mts Products, 107 Cal. Rptr. 3d 57 ...

    www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2282958/pou-chen...

    (Brienza v. Tepper (1995) 35 Cal. App. 4th 1839, 1843 [42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 690] (Brienza).) *193 Both the MTS defendants and Pou Chen rely on Brienza as support for their respective positions. In Brienza, the plaintiff, Brienza, obtained a judgment against the defendant, Tepper, after a jury trial in San Diego. Brienza's lawyers, who represented him on a contingency fee basis, had a contractual lien on the San Diego judgment.

  7. Volume 35 Cal. App. 4th California Courts of Appeal Cases ...

    law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/...

    Volume 35 Cal. App. 4th California Courts of Appeal Cases. Log In Sign Up. ... Brienza v. Tepper (1995) Citations: 35 Cal. App. 4th 1839, 42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 690. Ask a ...

  8. KEITH v. SUZANNE | FindLaw

    caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1064855.html

    Indeed, β€œThe offset of judgment against judgment is a matter of right absent the existence of facts establishing competing equities or an equitable defense precluding the offset.” (Brienza v. Tepper, supra, 35 Cal.App.4th at p. 1848, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 690.)

  9. Keith G. v. Suzanne H.

    fl.bna.com/fl/19980428/b110278.htm

    (Brienza v. Tepper, supra, 35 Cal.App.4th at p. 1848.) The Family Code does not expressly prohibit a trial court from allowing a setoff for obligations under conflicting support orders. Nor has any California published opinion considered whether such a setoff should be allowed. Williams v.

  10. POU CHEN CORPORATION v. M | 183 Cal.App.4th 188 ...

    www.leagle.com/decision/incaco20100304019

    OPINION. CHAVEZ, J. β€” Defendants, cross-complainants and appellants MTS Products (MTS) and Ben Hsia (Hsia) 1 appeal from a postjudgment order granting a motion by plaintiff, cross-defendant and respondent Pou Chen Corporation (Pou Chen) to offset an outstanding $12.8 million judgment against Pou Chen obtained by the MTS defendants (the MTS judgment) with approximately $24.1 million of an ...