Harris v. Bainhauer, 156 F. Supp. 2d 447 (E.D. Pa. 2001) case opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
quantitative scale.” Id. at 1072 (quoting Cipolla v. Shaposka, 439 Pa. 563, 566, 267 A.2d 854 (1970)). In the instant case, this Court determines that there exists only a false conflict of laws because the laws of both New Jersey and Pennsylvania would produce the same result. In a recent decision handed down in Harris v. Bainhauer, III, 2001
HARRIS v. VIEGELAHN, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit No. 14–400.
Free Database of 156 F. Supp. 2d, Volume 156 of the Federal Supplement, 2nd Series. US Federal Courts Reported Opinions, Decisions and Case Law from Justia
Harris v. Balk Case Brief - Rule of Law: A valid judgment by another state's court that had jurisdiction over a party must be given full faith and credit by another state's court.
Illustrative of the strict limitations which this Court has placed upon searches and seizures without a warrant in connection with a lawful arrest are the three cases of Marron v. United States, 275 U. S. 192; Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United States, 282 U. S. 344, and United States v. Lefkowitz, 285 U. S. 452.
Harris v. United States, 390 U.S. 234 (1968) Harris v. United States. No. 92. Argued January 18, 1968. Decided March 5, 1968. 390 U.S. 234. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Syllabus. Pursuant to a departmental regulation, a police officer searched a impounded car held as evidence of a robbery.
Lammers and Harris were parked next to each other. Harris was behind her vehicle (an Izusu) and was handing balloons to her children inside. Lammers backed out of her parking space and then pulled forward. As she did so, she clipped the door of Harris's Izusu and pinned Harris against the back of the vehicle.
Free Database of 2001 Eastern District of Pennsylvania US Federal District Court Case Law, Court Opinions & Decisions from Justia
Bainhauer, 156 F.Supp.2d 447, 448–50 (E.D.Pa.2001) (“The deemer statute provides that any policy issued by an insurance company authorized to conduct automobile insurance business in New Jersey must contain a provision which reforms an out-of-state policy to provide the New Jersey minimum requirements as to the first-party coverages when ...