Search results
- Case Summary of Mapp v. Ohio: Mapp’s home was searched absent a warrant. The search yielded the discovery of material classified as “obscene” under Ohio state law. The Supreme Court held that evidence obtained from an unreasonable search and seizure could not be used against the accused in criminal state court.
People also ask
Why was the Mapp v. Ohio court case so controversial?
Who is the plaintiff in Mapp vs Ohio?
What was the outcome of the Mapp v Ohio case?
Brief Fact Summary. Police officers sought a bombing suspect and evidence of the bombing at the petitioner, Miss Mapp’s (the “petitioner”) house. After failing to gain entry on an initial visit, the officers returned with what purported to be a search warrant, forcibly entered the residence, and conducted a search in which obscene ...
- United States V. Drayton
Terry v. Ohio392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889...
- United States V. Knights
Facts. Respondent Knights [“the respondent”], was sentenced...
- Whren V. United States
Mapp v. Ohio367 U.S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081...
- United States V. Awadallah
CitationUnited States v. Awadallah, 349 F.3d 42, 2003 U.S....
- Andresen V. Maryland
CitationAndresen v. Maryland, 423 U.S. 822, 1975 U.S. LEXIS...
- mapp v ohio
Brief. CitationMapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6...
- United States V. Drayton
Mar 11, 2017 · Case Summary of Mapp v. Ohio: Mapp’s home was searched absent a warrant. The search yielded the discovery of material classified as “obscene” under Ohio state law. The Supreme Court held that evidence obtained from an unreasonable search and seizure could not be used against the accused in criminal state court.
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) Mapp v. Ohio No. 236 Argued March 29, 1961 Decided June 19, 1961 367 U.S. 643 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO MR. JUSTICE CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellant stands convicted of knowingly having had in her possession and under her control certain lewd and lascivious books, pictures, and ...
Jul 19, 2001 · Jul 19, 2001. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684 (1961) FACTS: On May 23, 1957, three Cleveland police officers arrived at Mapp's residence in that city pursuant to information that "a person [was] hiding out in the home, who was wanted for questioning in connection with a recent bombing, and that there was a large amount of policy ...
Get Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
Feb 21, 2024 · Quick Summary. Dollree Mapp (defendant) was convicted of possessing obscene materials after an illegal search by police officers who lacked a proper warrant. The United States Supreme Court reviewed her case, challenging the admissibility of evidence obtained through unconstitutional means by state officials.
