Search results
Mar 5, 2024 · Citation: Miranda v Arizona 384 U.S. 436; 16 L. Ed. 2d 694; 86 S. Ct. 1602. Translation: Case name Miranda v. Arizona found in volume 384 of the United States Reports, page 436. with Parallel Citations - 16 L. Ed. 2d 694; 86 S. Ct. 1602. Translation: volume 16 of the United States Supreme Court Reports, Lawyer's Edition, 2nd series, page 694 ...
- Federal & State Cases
In addition to finding Supreme Court Cases in Lexis-Nexis...
- Essential Resources
Coverage and access to scholarly articles, symposia,...
- Law
Search the full text of this site. Results will link to...
- Federal & State Cases
- Abbreviations in Apa Legal Citations
- Citing Federal Court Cases
- Citing State Court Cases
Most words are abbreviated in legal citations. This means that a very large number of standard abbreviations exist. Consult resources like this pageto familiarize yourself with common abbreviations. Pages where case information is found online also tend to show the correct form of citation for the case in question. You can check these to make sure ...
Federal court cases are those that take place at the national level in the U.S.—in the U.S. Supreme Court, a circuit court, or a district court.
State courts are those that operate in specific states rather than federally. The two kinds of state court that are commonly cited are supreme courts and appellate courts. They are both cited in a similar format.
Miranda v. Arizona. Media. Oral Argument - February 28, 1966. Oral Argument - March 01, 1966. Oral Argument - March 02, 1966. Opinions. Syllabus. View Case. Petitioner. Miranda. Respondent. Arizona. Location. Phoenix, Arizona. Docket no. 759. Decided by. Warren Court. Citation. 384 US 436 (1966) Argued. Feb 28 - 2, 1966. Decided. Jun 13, 1966.
Here is an example. Suppose that you would like to cite a chapter by the author Jane Smith in a paper you’re writing about the history of pies. You input the source’s bibliographic information into the citation generator, you indicate that you’re using APA style, and you get the following in-text citation: (Smith, 2015, pp. 122-128)
Jan 24, 2021 · Decision Issued: Jun 13, 1966. Petitioner: Ernesto Miranda, a suspect who was arrested and brought to the Phoenix, Arizona, police station for questioning. Respondent: State of Arizona. Key Question: Does the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination extend to the police interrogation of a suspect?
41–60. Published: April 2010. Split View. Annotate. Cite. Permissions. Share. Abstract. This chapter describes the crime and the subsequent police interrogation and trial, all of which led to the 1966 Supreme Court decision ruling that criminal defendants had the right to counsel or to remain silent when facing a possible interrogation.
People also ask
What was the decision in Miranda v Arizona?
Did Miranda violate his constitutional rights?
What was the 'Miranda case'?
Did Miranda understand his rights?
The purposes of this chapter are the following: first, to describe what led up to the Miranda v. Arizona decision rendered by the United States Supreme Court in 1966 (that is, to review not only those earlier Supreme Court decisions that dealt with interrogations but also the nature of police questioning at that time); second, to identify the goals of the justices in the Miranda decision ...
