Search results
Nov 8, 2018 · Liberalism. Jusificatory neutrality, as explained above, is Nagel's version of liberalism. Catholics. Nagel assumes that instability ensues when citizens believe that the state makes policy on the basis of reasons which they reject. Thus he assumes that the state will cause instability when it does not satisfy justificatory neutrality.
- Briefly, it seems that he thinks liberalism, ideally, is when a person in power takes the interests of a person without power so perfectly that h...
- One argument Nagel makes is that as with Occam's Razor, government policy should be set by the framework that requires the fewest positive assertio...
- Simon Caney, who does not accept the validity of Nagel's arguments in 'Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy', none the less provides an accurate...
May 25, 2006 · Nagel claims that I “ridicule” and “deride” Rawls’s view, and casts my disagreement with Rawlsian liberalism as a failure to understand it. I leave it to readers of Public Philosophy to judge for themselves whether anything I say about Rawls remotely approaches ridicule or derision. But I would like to show why Nagel is wrong to ...
Thomas Nagel on Mind, Morality, and Political Theory 1. rightly deserves this note. He has managed to accomplish a rare thing; to write on the deepest philosophical problems in a simple way. With. philosophy of mind, metaphysics, epistemology, and ethical and political theory.
Feb 5, 2024 · Nagel is on far surer ground when he contrasts the objective moral superiority of liberal society with the objective moral depravity of the Nazi and Bolshevik regimes than when he reflects on what he regards as the objectively absolute moral progress of a deontologically based liberalism and the objectively absolute moral catastrophe of its ...
Mar 22, 2024 · Nagel concedes the point about path dependency: that to be a liberal, now, is to be in a path-dependent location shaped by, in Williams’s words, the “historical experience which has made him the liberal he is.” That is, Nagel thinks, no obstacle to his temporally indexed notion of objective moral knowledge.
Sep 22, 2021 · This chapter explores Nagel’s polemics. It shows these have a two-fold character: (i) to defend liberal civilization against all kinds of enemies. And (ii) to defend what he calls ‘contextual naturalism.’. And the chapter shows that (i-ii) reinforce each other and undermine alternative political and philosophical programs.
People also ask
What does Nagel say about liberalism?
What does Nagel mean by Liberal toleration?
How does Nagel treat the reality of moral decline?
Does Nagel change moral beliefs?
According to the American philosopher Thomas Nagel, liberalism is the conjunction of two ideals: (1) individuals should have liberty of thought and speech and wide freedom to live their lives as they choose (so long as they do not harm others in certain ways), and (2) individuals in any society…. Other articles where Thomas Nagel is discussed ...
