Search results
May 31, 2024 · "Atkins v. Virginia" published on by null. 536 U.S. 304 (2002), argued 20 Feb. 2002, decided 20 June 2002 by vote of 6 to 3; Stevens for the Court, O’Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer concurring, Rehnquist, Scalia, and Thomas in dissent.
May 28, 2024 · This Article expands upon the analysis articulated in Atkins v. Virginia, in which the U.S. Supreme Court exempted individuals with intellectual disability from the death penalty after considering both the practical realities they face in the criminal legal system and the theories of punishment.
May 31, 2024 · In 2002, the Court in Atkins v. Virginia barred the execution of people with intellectual disability because they “do not act with the level of moral culpability that characterizes the most serious adult criminal conduct” and because “ their disabilities in areas of reasoning, judgment, and control of their impulses [can] j eopardize the ...
May 12, 2024 · Supreme Court Decisions Atkins v. Virginia (2002) Facts of the case: In Virginia, Daryl Atkins was found guilty of capital murder, armed robbery, and abduction. He was in the lowest percentile of intelligence, with a full-scale IQ of 59.
May 30, 2024 · Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) – The execution of mentally retarded offenders is unconstitutional. Panetti v. Quarterman , 551 U.S. 930 (2007) – A person may not be executed if they do not understand the reason for their imminent execution.
May 30, 2024 · Citators: Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) 1. I see a yellow flag by the case which means that it has negative treatment but is still good law. 2. Sanchez v. Pennsylvania, 133 S.Ct 122, 184 L.Ed.2d 58 (2012) did not follow the precedent in Atkins. 3. Fletcher v. State,
3 days ago · Further limitations were placed on the death penalty in Atkins v. Virginia (2002; death penalty unconstitutional for people with an intellectual disability) and Roper v. Simmons (2005; death penalty unconstitutional if defendant was under age 18 at the time the crime was committed).
