Search results
Feb 26, 2021 · The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine extends the exclusionary rule by excluding any evidence exposed through other evidence attained by an illegal search, seizure, or arrest. The initial evidence obtained through a constitutional violation is the “poisonous tree.”
Fruit of the poisonous trees is a doctrine that extends the exclusionary rule to make evidence inadmissible in court if it was derived from evidence that was illegally obtained. As the metaphor suggests, if the evidential "tree" is tainted, so is its "fruit."
Fruit of the poisonous tree is a legal metaphor used to describe evidence that is obtained illegally. The logic of the terminology is that if the source (the "tree") of the evidence or evidence itself is tainted, then anything gained (the "fruit") from it is tainted as well.
Oct 13, 2023 · The "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine is a legal concept related to the exclusionary rule. Under this doctrine, a court may exclude evidence seized in an unlawful search and seizure and other evidence derived from the illegal search.
The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine prevents the prosecution from admitting certain evidence into a criminal case after it has been tainted by a primary illegality. This doctrine is meant to remove illegally-acquired evidence from negatively impacting a criminal defendant.
In view of this, there is no "poisonous tree" whose fruits we must evaluate, and Blackie's declaration at the time of the arrest and the narcotics found in Yee's possession are admissible in evidence.
Feb 19, 2018 · Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine: A rule under which evidence that is the direct result of illegal conduct on the part of an official is inadmissible in a criminal trial against the victim of the conduct. The doctrine draws its name from the idea that once the tree is poisoned the primary evidence is illegally obtained,
Jan 10, 2023 · Fruit of the poisonous tree includes evidence gathered from just about any kind of police conduct that violates a defendant's constitutional rights. Take an illegal wiretap, for example. Suppose the police begin to listen in on and record the statements of suspected drug dealers without first getting a warrant.
Jul 3, 2019 · United States developed the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine, ruling that even evidence distantly related to an exploitative and illegal arrest should not be used in court. Wong Sun v. United States also extended the exclusionary rule to verbal statements.
Aug 13, 2020 · The exclusionary rule can also extend to chains of evidence, through a doctrine known as "fruit of the poisonous tree." This describes the idea that evidence collected based on other, illegally obtained evidence is also not admissible.
