Search results
Arizona. On March 13, 1963, petitioner, Ernesto Miranda, was arrested at his home and taken in custody to a Phoenix police station. He was there identified by the complaining witness.
'436 OCTOBER TERM, 1965. s,·llabus. . 384 U.S. ' MIRANDA v. ARIZONA. CERTIORARI TO THE SU-fREME COURT OF ARIZONA. . ' ·No. 759. Argued February 28-March 1, 1966.-, Decided June 13, 1966.* · In each of these cases the defendant while in police custody was questioned by police officers, detectives, or'a prosecuting attorney
MIRANDA v. ARIZONA . 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Chief Justice W. ARREN. delivered the opinion of the Court. The cases before us raise questions which go to the roots of our concepts of American criminal jurisprudence: the restraints society must observe consistent with the Federal Constitution in prosecuting individuals for crime.
Dec 22, 2009 · Decided on June 13, 1966; 384 US 436. In order to safeguard the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, the police must advise criminal suspects, prior to interrogation, that anything they say can be used against them in court, that they have the rights to remain silent, to consult with a lawyer and to have one appointed if they ...
Argued February 28-March 1, 1966. Decided June 13, 1966 * 384 U.S. 436. Syllabus. In each of these cases, the defendant, while in police custody, was questioned by police officers, detectives, or a prosecuting attorney in a room in which he was cut off from the outside world.
The jury found Miranda guilty. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed and held that Miranda’s constitutional rights were not violated because he did not specifically request counsel.
Nov 20, 2023 · Miranda v. Arizona (consolidated with Westover v. United States, Vignera v. New York, and California v. Stewart ), 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark 5-4 decision of the United States Supreme Court which was argued February 28–March 1, 1966 and decided June 13, 1966.
