Search results
Not a credible source
- Although Wikipedia is a good place to start your research, it is not a credible source you should cite in your research papers. Wikipedia allows all kinds of different users to edit, and it is not safe to assume that the facts presented there have been checked before publishing them.
paperpile.com › g › wikipedia-credible-source
People also ask
Is Wikipedia a reliable source for academic research?
Is Wikipedia a reliable source?
Are students told not to use Wikipedia for research?
Is Wikipedia a credible resource?
Nov 4, 2021 · Wikipedia offers free and reliable information instantly. So why do teachers almost universally distrust it? Wikipedia has community-enforced policies on neutrality, reliability and notability.
The fact that Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic research doesn't mean that it's wrong to use basic reference materials when you're trying to familiarize yourself with a topic.
This latest study, however, shows that if consumed carefully, Wikipedia can be a legitimate resource. “The first step is admitting that everyone, from students to doctors, uses Wikipedia,” writes Jake Orlowitz, the head of The Wikipedia Library at the Wikimedia Foundation, in a blog.
Jan 24, 2024 · Wikipedia has moved far beyond its initial limitations, and is a helpful—and reputable—source for conducting research. By Mike Caulfield, Sam Wineburg. January 24, 2024. Dan Page / The iSpot. Your middle school teacher threatened to give you an F if you cited it.
- Mike Caulfield
Nov 5, 2021 · November 5, 2021. Students are told not to use Wikipedia for research, but it's a trustworthy source. by Rachel Cunneen, Mathieu O'neil, The Conversation. Credit: AI-generated image. At the...
If you use one of these in your research, it is probably a primary source. Primary sources are often considered the most credible in terms of providing evidence for your argument, as they give you direct evidence of what you are researching.
