Search results
1 day ago · By Amy Howe. on May 28, 2024 at 10:42 am. The court agreed to take up in City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday. (Katie Barlow) The justices agreed to take up a Clean Water Act case brought by San Francisco against the Environmental Protection Agency in a scheduled list of orders on Tuesday. The case was ...
May 30, 2024 · The right to counsel. THE 1960s brought significant expansion of the constitutional rights of criminal defendants. The crucial moment that set these changes in motion was the famous case of Miranda v. Arizona, in which the US Supreme Court laid down new rules for interrogating criminal suspects. The year was 1963.
People also ask
What was the Miranda v Arizona case?
Who authored Miranda v Arizona?
What is the difference between Miranda v Arizona & Loving v Virginia?
What was Roe v Wade & Miranda v Arizona?
5 days ago · In this case, the D.C. Court of Appeals found that the detective’s statement to Green may have confused him: . . . the Supreme Court has acknowledged the concern that can arise when “the reference to the right to appointed counsel [is] linked to a future point in time after the police interrogation . . .
1 day ago · Texas v. Johnson (1989) This case ruled that individuals have the right to burn the American flag. It’s protected as free speech. The Court ruled that even if it’s offensive, it’s still a ...
5 days ago · The Supreme Court has clarified that a traffic stop does not necessarily render a driver “in custody” for purposes of Miranda. See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 441 (1984). 2 23-774 Instead, to determine whether Griffin was in custody, we look to the “totality of facts involved at the time of the alleged restraint.”
5 days ago · In a consolidated appeal, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit affirmed the denial of relief for the northern cases and reversed the grant of relief for the southern ones. The panel said that, “[u]sing the tools of history and tradition to which the Supreme Court directed us in [District of Columbia v.]
5 days ago · Spizzirri, 601 U.S. ___, 144 S. Ct. 680 (2024), were current and former delivery drivers for an on-demand delivery service who sued their employer in a putative class action in Arizona state court ...
