Search results
4 days ago · THE 1960s brought significant expansion of the constitutional rights of criminal defendants. The crucial moment that set these changes in motion was the famous case of Miranda v. Arizona, in which the US Supreme Court laid down new rules for interrogating criminal suspects.
5 days ago · Season 2024 Episode 110 | 27m |. The lawsuit began between Arizona schools and the state for better resources. The Mexican election will occur on June 2nd and will have a few differences to prior...
5 days ago · the claim is arizona doesn't properly fund public k-12 schools. >> IT WOULD BE FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTERS. IT'S DEALING WITH THE CAPITAL FUNDING FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
- 27 min
5 days ago · The right to remain silent was famously upheld in the 1966 Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona. Miranda rights, which include the right to remain silent, must be read to individuals upon arrest.
5 days ago · Walstad’s motion cited U.S. Supreme Court precedent from Schad v. Arizona, which found that a defendant’s due process rights have been violated if the jury instructions did not require ...
4 days ago · Upon execution of the search warrant, law enforcement discovered drugs and a firearm, and subsequently arrested Espinoza. Officer Damian Neiswanger read Espinoza his Miranda rights, at which point Espinoza informed him he did not want to speak to the police.1 See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
5 days ago · Arizona's July 30 primary could test your patience in the new voting landscape. Here's why. Arizona is just two months away from the July primary. Voters will decide who represents them on the ...
