Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Brief Fact Summary. Gideon was charged with a felony in Florida state court. He appeared before the state Court, informing the Court he was indigent and requested that the Court appoint him an attorney.

    • Betts V. Brady

      CitationBetts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455, 62 S. Ct. 1252, 86 L....

    • Ross V. Moffit

      CitationRoss v. Moffitt, 417 U.S. 600, 94 S. Ct. 2437, 41 L....

  2. The Supreme Court, in reaching its conclusion that the right to counsel is a fundamental right imposed upon the states pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, engages in an analysis of its previous decisions holding that other provisions of the Bill of Rights are fundamental rights made obligatory on the States.

  3. Gideon v. Wainwright 372 U. 335 (1963) Facts: Issue (s): Should this Court’s holding in Betts v. Brady, 316 U. 455, be considered? Holding: The court disagrees with the holding of Betts v. Brady in part, as the court think that Sixth.

    • (3)
  4. FACTS: Gerald (“Jerry”) Gault was a 15 year-old accused of making an obscene telephone call to a neighbor, Mrs. Cook, on June 8, 1964. After Mrs. Cook filed a complaint, Gault and a friend, Ronald Lewis, were arrested and taken to the Children’s Detention Home.

  5. Gideon v. Wainwright. Download. PDF. Check. Treatment. Summary. holding that the Sixth Amendment requires counsel in all state felony prosecutions. Summary of this case from Nichols v. United States. See 25 Summaries. Meet CoCounsel, pioneering AI that’s secure, reliable, and trained for the law. Try CoCounsel free. Opinion.

  6. Gideon v. Wainwright is a landmark case that solidified the right to counsel for indigent defendants in state criminal proceedings. The decision established that access to legal representation is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial.

  7. People also ask

  8. Feb 21, 2024 · Quick Summary. Clarence Earl Gideon (defendant) faced felony charges without legal representation and was convicted. He challenged this on constitutional grounds. The Supreme Court considered whether states are obligated under the Fourteenth Amendment to provide legal counsel in felony cases for those who cannot afford it.