Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.loc.gov › item › usrep384436U.S. Reports: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

   www.loc.gov › item › usrep384436

   • Cached

   APA citation style: Warren, E. & Supreme Court Of The United States. (1965) U.S. Reports: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436. [Periodical] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep384436/.

2. www.scribbr.com › apa-examples › court-caseHow to Cite Court Cases in APA Style | Format & Examples

   www.scribbr.com › apa-examples › court-case

   • Cached

   Feb 4, 2021 · In the reference, specify only a single page number—the page where the coverage of that case begins—instead of a full page range. You can easily create citations for court cases using our free APA Citation Generator. APA format. Name v. Name, Volume number Reporter Page number ( Court Year ). URL.

   • How do I cite a court case with no page number in APA Style?

     In APA Style , when you’re citing a recent court case that has not yet been reported in print and thus doesn’t have a specific page number, incl...
   • How do I cite a court case reported in multiple publications in APA Style?

     With APA legal citations, it’s recommended to cite all the reporters (publications reporting cases) in which a court case appears. To cite mult...
   • Do I need to include a URL in an APA legal reference?

     No, including a URL is optional in APA Style reference entries for legal sources (e.g. court cases , laws ). It can be useful to do so to aid...

3. People also ask

   What is Miranda v Arizona?

   • Miranda v. Arizona | Oyez Miranda v. Arizona This case represents the consolidation of four cases, in each of which the defendant confessed guilt after being subjected to a variety of interrogation techniques without being informed of his Fifth Amendment rights during an interrogation.

   Miranda v. Arizona | Oyez

   www.oyez.org/cases/1965/759

   See all results for this question

   Did Miranda violate his constitutional rights?

   • The jury found Miranda guilty. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed and held that Miranda’s constitutional rights were not violated because he did not specifically request counsel. Does the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination extend to the police interrogation of a suspect?

   Miranda v. Arizona | Oyez

   www.oyez.org/cases/1965/759

   See all results for this question

   Did Miranda understand his rights?

   • The paper on which he wrote his confession stated that the information was given voluntarily and that he understood his rights. However, no specific rights were listed on the paper. Miranda was found guilty in an Arizona court based largely on the written confession. He was sentenced to 20 to 30 years for both crimes to be served concurrently.

   Miranda v Arizona: Supreme Court Case - ThoughtCo

   www.thoughtco.com/miranda-v-arizona-104966

   See all results for this question

   What are legal citations in APA style?

   • Revised on December 27, 2023. Legal citations (e.g. court cases, laws) in APA Style look somewhat different from other APA citations. They generally don’t list authors, and abbreviations are used to make them more concise. Citations for court cases refer to reporters, the publications in which cases are documented.

   How to Cite Court Cases in APA Style | Format & Examples - Scribbr

   www.scribbr.com/apa-examples/court-case/

   See all results for this question

4. www.oyez.org › cases › 1965Miranda v. Arizona | Oyez

   www.oyez.org › cases › 1965

   Miranda v. Arizona. Media. Oral Argument - February 28, 1966. Oral Argument - March 01, 1966. Oral Argument - March 02, 1966. Opinions. Syllabus. View Case. Petitioner. Miranda. Respondent. Arizona. Location. Phoenix, Arizona. Docket no. 759. Decided by. Warren Court. Citation. 384 US 436 (1966) Argued. Feb 28 - 2, 1966. Decided. Jun 13, 1966.

5. rwu.libguides.com › cLibGuides: Law and Justice Studies: Reading Legal Citations

   rwu.libguides.com › c

   Mar 5, 2024 · Citation: Miranda v Arizona 384 U.S. 436; 16 L. Ed. 2d 694; 86 S. Ct. 1602. Translation: Case name Miranda v. Arizona found in volume 384 of the United States Reports, page 436. with Parallel Citations - 16 L. Ed. 2d 694; 86 S. Ct. 1602. Translation: volume 16 of the United States Supreme Court Reports, Lawyer's Edition, 2nd series, page 694 ...

   • Author: Susan McMullen

   • Publish Year: 2009

6. www.thoughtco.com › miranda-v-arizona-104966Miranda v Arizona: Supreme Court Case - ThoughtCo

   www.thoughtco.com › miranda-v-arizona-104966

   • Cached

   Jan 24, 2021 · Updated on January 24, 2021. Miranda v. Arizona was a significant Supreme Court case that ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless the defendant has been informed of their right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything they say will be held against them.

7. link.springer.com › referenceworkentry › 10Miranda v. Arizona | SpringerLink

   link.springer.com › referenceworkentry › 10

   • Cached

   Jan 1, 2018 · Heilbronner, R.L. (2018). Miranda v. Arizona. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1010. Download citation.RIS.ENW.BIB; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1010. Published: 20 September 2018. Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

8. www.law.cornell.edu › wex › miranda_v_arizona_(1966)Miranda v. Arizona (1966) | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal ...

   www.law.cornell.edu › wex › miranda_v_arizona_(1966)

   • Cached

   The Supreme Court held that the custodial interrogation of an individual must be accompanied by an instruction that the person has the right to remain silent, any statements made can be used against the person, and that the individual has the right to counsel, either retained or appointed; absent these safeguards, statements made in this context...