Search results
An experiment is reported which tests Fazey & Hardy's (1988) catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. Eight experienced basketball players were required to perform a set shooting task, under conditions of high and low cognitive anxiety. On each of these occasions, physiological arousal was …
- Lew Hardy, Gaynor Parfitt
- 1991
Abstract. the cusp catastrophe model which has been reviewed in this chapter arose as a result of Hardy and Fazey's (1987) dissatisfaction with both the inverted-U and existing multidimensional anxiety explanations of the anxiety-performance relationship (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
- Lew Hardy
- 1990
Abstract. An experiment is reported which tests Fazey & Hardy's (1988) catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. Eight experienced basketball players were required to perform a set shooting task, under conditions of high and low cognitive anxiety.
- Lew Hardy, Gaynor Parfitt
- 1991
Ss' performances were higher, their minimum performance lower, and their maximum decrements in performance greater in the high cognitive anxiety condition than in the low cognitive anxiety condition, which supports Fazey and Hardy's catastrophe model of anxiety and performance.
- Lew Hardy, Gaynor Parfitt
- 1991
Abstract. J. A. Fazey and L. Hardy's (1988) cusp catastrophe model of anxiety and performance has been criticized for being overly complex and difficult to test. Hardy attempts to clarify the model for researchers who are less familiar with its more subtle nuances.
- Lew Hardy
- 1996
Fazey, J. & Hardy, L. (1988). The Inverted-U Hypothesis: Catastrophe for sport psychology. British Association of Sports Sciences Monograph No. 1. Leeds: The National Coaching Foundation. Hardy, L. (1990). A catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. In J. G. Jones & L. Hardy (Eds.), Stress and performance in sport. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Jun 1, 1996 · L. Hardy. Published 1 June 1996. Psychology. Sport Psychologist. Hardy and Fazey’s (1987) cusp catastrophe model of anxiety and performance has been criticized for being overly complex and difficult to test. The present paper attempts to clarify the model for researchers who are less familiar with its more subtle nuances; it then ...
