Search results
Apr 4, 2022 · Study Sections. Applications are reviewed in study sections (Scientific Review Group, SRG). Review Branches (RBs) are clusters of study sections based on scientific discipline. Find a Study Section. - or - Use the Assisted Referral Tool.
- Fellowship
Study Sections. Applications are reviewed in study sections...
- Small Business and Technology
Study Section Study Section Description Scientific Review...
- Hiv/Aids Research
HIV/AIDS-related grant applications are reviewed on an...
- Fellowship
Google's service, offered free of charge, instantly translates words, phrases, and web pages between English and over 100 other languages.
- Play to The House
- Target Your Assigned Reviewers
- Don't Neglect The Others
- Check Membership
- Be in Sync with Your Reviewers
- How to proceed with The Search
- Gauge The Effect on Your Writing
- Note Any Competitors
Tell your reviewers why the Institute should fund you and why they should give you the best score by describing how your topic is high impact and your objectives worth pursuing. Fire up your reviewers by convincing them of these key points: 1. Your proposal has a strong potential to have a high impact on its field of science. 2. Your approach is lo...
Help your assigned reviewers become your advocate by building a strong case for your research and making it easy for them to perform. Organize and write so your assigned reviewers can readily find and understand the goals, significance, and feasibility of your project. Make explaining your research easy by including lines they can deliver to the re...
During the roughly 15-minute discussion, members of the group will ask the assigned reviewers questions and skim parts of the application—most likely, the following: 1. Abstract 2. Specific Aims 3. Significance section of your Research Strategy So you'll write those sections to meet the needs of those reviewers who are experts in other fields. In a...
After you have chosen a study section, determine how its membership may affect your writing. Being reviewed by a group that appreciates your scientific perspective and project is critical to your success. Your grant application makes the case that you are a scientist who is competent to lead an important research project. But as with anything, beau...
First and foremost, your reviewers need to share your perspective that the topic you chose is vital to your field. The repercussions of not having the right reviewers are great, e.g., they may see the field as having other priorities (you chose the wrong project) or believe that the research you proposed is too far out of the mainstream (the projec...
Look at the rosters online, and find a committee with some people who will appreciate your research and share your scientific perspective. Be aware that this process is not perfect: the Center for Scientific Review may reconfigure study sections, use ad hoc reviewers, or (more rarely) not honor your request. But even though there's no guarantee tha...
After you have picked a study section, determine how its membership will affect your writing. Try to figure out who could be your assigned reviewers, so you can tailor your writing to them (or others who may be present at the meeting with comparable expertise). To learn more about their research, go to their Web sites, and read their publications. ...
Look for reviewers who cannot give your application an impartial review. This is not to say you should categorically avoid competitors. If you can trust them to stay objective, they may actually help you since they already know your field and appreciate the significance of your research. However, if you believe the study section has appropriate exp...
Dec 19, 2023 · The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) conducts and supports basic and applied research to better understand, treat, and ultimately prevent infectious, immunologic, and allergic diseases. Following is a brief description of the major areas of investigation. Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS).
First-Level Peer Review. Your application's most significant test is initial peer review. Learn who reviews your application, the role of different reviewers, what happens at a review meeting, how to interpret your summary statement, and your next steps.
Learn more about who qualifies as a new investigator under NIH’s definition and how that status benefits you at NIAID's Information for New Investigators. NIH Versus NIAID: Locus of Review. Initial peer review is one key area where the NIH versus IC distinction matters.
The study sections are the Clinical Integrative Cardiovascular and Hematological Sciences (CCHS), Cardiovascular Differentiation and Development (CDD), Integrative Myocardial Physiology/Pathophysiology A (MPPA), Integrative Myocardial Physiology/Pathophysiology B (MPPB), and Therapeutic Development and Preclinical Studies (TDPS).
